Abstract Background The development and clinical success of KRAS ^G12C inhibitors was a landmark achievement in anti-cancer drug development, as oncogenic KRAS had long been considered an intractable therapeutic target. Patients with KRAS mutant lung cancers frequently present with co-mutations in the KEAP1-NRF2 pathway, and because genetic activation of NRF2 results in resistance to all current anti-cancer therapies, we were motivated to explore how aberrant activation of NRF2 impacts the clinical response to KRAS ^G12C inhibitors. Methods A broad range of techniques, including genetic knockouts, scRNA-seq and surface plasmon resonance, were used to determine the effect of KRAS ^G12C drugs on NRF2. Results At physiologically-relevant concentrations, both of the clinically-approved KRAS ^G12C inhibitors Sotorasib and Adagrasib also function as inducers of NRF2. Mechanistically, the same cysteine-targeting functionality which allows these electrophilic drugs to inhibit the mutant KRAS ^G12C protein also facilitates their binding to cysteine-based sensors in KEAP1, resulting in the upregulation of the NRF2-dependent gene expression program. Conclusions The activation of NRF2 by KRAS-G12C inhibitors represents a unique example of anti-cancer drugs which positively regulate the activity of a protein which is normally considered to be an oncogene. In both the malignant cells of the tumour and immune cells within the microenvironment, activation of NRF2 by electrophilic KRAS inhibitors positively contributes to the clinical efficacy of these drugs by promoting anti-cancer immunity. This unprecedented situation, in which the NRF2-dependent oxidative stress response is induced globally within cancer patients, has a number of important clinical implications, particularly in relation to ongoing combination chemotherapy clinical trials, as well as for selecting patient populations which may derive the most benefit from G12Ci anti-cancer drugs.

Accumulating evidence has revealed unexpected phenotypic heterogeneity and diverse functions of neutrophils in several diseases. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) can alter the leukocyte phenotype based on disease severity, including neutrophil activation in severe cases. However, the plasticity of neutrophil phenotypes and their relative impact on COVID-19 pathogenesis has not been well addressed. This study aimed to identify and validate the heterogeneity of neutrophils in COVID-19 and evaluate the functions of each subpopulation. We analyzed public single-cell RNA-seq, bulk RNA-seq, and proteome data from healthy donors and patients with COVID-19 to investigate neutrophil subpopulations and their response to disease pathogenesis. We identified eight neutrophil subtypes: pro-neutrophil, pre-neutrophil, immature neutrophil, and five mature neutrophil subpopulations. The subtypes exhibited distinct features, including diverse activation signatures and multiple enriched pathways. The pro-neutrophil subtype was associated with severe and fatal disease, while the pre-neutrophil subtype was particularly abundant in mild/moderate disease. One of the mature neutrophil subtypes showed consistently large fractions in patients with different disease severity. Bulk RNA-seq dataset analyses using a cellular deconvolution approach validated the relative abundances of neutrophil subtypes and the expansion of pro-neutrophils in severe COVID-19 patients. Cell–cell communication analysis revealed representative ligand–receptor interactions among the identified neutrophil subtypes. Further investigation into transcription factors and differential protein abundance revealed the regulatory network differences between healthy donors and patients with severe COVID-19. Overall, we demonstrated the complex interactions among heterogeneous neutrophil subtypes and other blood cell types during COVID-19 disease. Our work has great value in terms of both clinical and public health as it furthers our understanding of the phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of neutrophils and other cell populations in multiple diseases.

Introduction Infection with SARS-CoV-2 leads to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which can result in acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure. However, its comprehensive influence on pathological immune responses in the respiratory epithelium and peripheral immune cells is not yet fully understood. Methods In this study, we analyzed multiple public scRNA-seq datasets of nasopharyngeal swabs and peripheral blood to investigate the gene regulatory networks (GRNs) of healthy individuals and COVID-19 patients with mild/moderate and severe disease, respectively. Cell-cell communication networks among cell types were also inferred. Finally, validations were conducted using bulk RNA-seq and proteome data. Results Similar and dissimilar regulons were identified within or between epithelial and immune cells during COVID-19 severity progression. The relative transcription factors (TFs) and their targets were used to construct GRNs among different infection sites and conditions. Between respiratory epithelial and peripheral immune cells, different TFs tended to be used to regulate the activity of a cell between healthy individuals and COVID-19 patients, although they had some TFs in common. For example, XBP1, FOS, STAT1, and STAT2 were activated in both the epithelial and immune cells of virus-infected individuals. In contrast, severe COVID-19 cases exhibited activation of CEBPD in peripheral immune cells, while CEBPB was exclusively activated in respiratory epithelial cells. Moreover, in patients with severe COVID-19, although some inflammatory genes, such as S100A8/A9, were found to be upregulated in both respiratory epithelial and peripheral immune cells, their relative regulators can differ in terms of cell types. The cell-cell communication analysis suggested that epidermal growth factor receptor signaling among epithelia contributes to mild/moderate disease, and chemokine signaling among immune cells contributes to severe disease. Conclusion This study identified cell type- and condition-specific regulons in a wide range of cell types from the initial infection site to the peripheral blood, and clarified the diverse mechanisms of maladaptive responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: NF-E2-related factor 2 (NRF2) is a transcription factor that regulates cytoprotective gene expression in response to oxidative and electrophilic stresses. NRF2 activity is mainly controlled by Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1). Constitutive NRF2 activation by NRF2 mutations or KEAP1 dysfunction results in a poor prognosis for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) through the activation of cytoprotective functions. However, the detailed contributions of NRF2 to ESCC initiation or promotion have not been clarified. Here, we investigated the fate of NRF2-activated cells in the esophageal epithelium. METHODS: We generated tamoxifen-inducible, squamous epithelium-specific Keap1 conditional knockout (Keap1-cKO) mice in which NRF2 was inducibly activated in a subset of cells at the adult stage. Histologic, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, single-cell RNA-sequencing, and carcinogen experiments were conducted to analyze the Keap1-cKO esophagus. RESULTS: KEAP1-deleted/NRF2-activated cells and cells with normal NRF2 expression (KEAP1-normal cells) coexisted in the Keap1-cKO esophageal epithelium in approximately equal numbers, and NRF2-activated cells formed dysplastic lesions. NRF2-activated cells exhibited weaker attachment to the basement membrane and gradually disappeared from the epithelium. In contrast, neighboring KEAP1-normal cells exhibited accelerated proliferation and started dominating the epithelium but accumulated DNA damage that triggered carcinogenesis upon carcinogen exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Constitutive NRF2 activation promotes the selective elimination of epithelial cells via cell competition, but this competition induces DNA damage in neighboring KEAP1-normal cells, which predisposes them to chemical-induced ESCC.