Comprehensive genomic profiling enables genomic biomarker detection in advanced solid tumors. Here, to evaluate the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genotyping, we compare trial enrollment using ctDNA sequencing in 1,687 patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in SCRUM-Japan GOZILA (no. UMIN000016343), an observational ctDNA-based screening study, to enrollment using tumor tissue sequencing in the same centers and network (GI-SCREEN, 5,621 patients). ctDNA genotyping significantly shortened the screening duration (11 versus 33 days, P < 0.0001) and improved the trial enrollment rate (9.5 versus 4.1%, P < 0.0001) without compromising treatment efficacy compared to tissue genotyping. We also describe the clonal architecture of ctDNA profiles in ~2,000 patients with advanced GI cancer, which reinforces the relevance of many targetable oncogenic drivers and highlights multiple new drivers as candidates for clinical development. ctDNA genotyping has the potential to accelerate innovation in precision medicine and its delivery to individual patients.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an anti-HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a cytotoxic topoisomerase I inhibitor. The drug may have efficacy in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: In an open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial, we evaluated trastuzumab deruxtecan as compared with chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. Patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma that had progressed while they were receiving at least two previous therapies, including trastuzumab, were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (6.4 mg per kilogram of body weight every 3 weeks) or physician's choice of chemotherapy. The primary end point was the objective response, according to independent central review. Secondary end points included overall survival, response duration, progression-free survival, confirmed response (response persisting ≥4 weeks), and safety. RESULTS: Of 187 treated patients, 125 received trastuzumab deruxtecan and 62 chemotherapy (55 received irinotecan and 7 paclitaxel). An objective response was reported in 51% of the patients in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group, as compared with 14% of those in the physician's choice group (P<0.001). Overall survival was longer with trastuzumab deruxtecan than with chemotherapy (median, 12.5 vs. 8.4 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.39 to 0.88; P = 0.01, which crossed the prespecified O'Brien-Fleming boundary [0.0202 on the basis of number of deaths]). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were a decreased neutrophil count (in 51% of the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and 24% of the physician's choice group), anemia (38% and 23%, respectively), and decreased white-cell count (21% and 11%). A total of 12 patients had trastuzumab deruxtecan-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis (grade 1 or 2 in 9 patients and grade 3 or 4 in 3), as adjudicated by an independent committee. One drug-related death (due to pneumonia) was noted in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group; no drug-related deaths occurred in the physician's choice group. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with trastuzumab deruxtecan led to significant improvements in response and overall survival, as compared with standard therapies, among patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer. Myelosuppression and interstitial lung disease were the notable toxic effects. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; DESTINY-Gastric01 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03329690.).

Trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), has improved survival in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (AGC). The inevitable development of resistance to trastuzumab remains a problem, however, with several treatment strategies that have proven effective in breast cancer having failed to show clinical benefit in AGC. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms underlying resistance to HER2-targeted therapy and outline past and current challenges in the treatment of HER2-positive AGC refractory to trastuzumab. We further describe novel agents such as HER2 antibody-drug conjugates that are under development and have shown promising antitumor activity in early studies.

Therapies targeted to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) have proven effective against tumors positive for HER2 amplification, but there is an unmet clinical need for the treatment of tumors that express HER2 protein in the absence of HER2 amplification. [fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate composed of the anti-HER2 antibody and the topoisomerase I inhibitor, an exatecan derivative. It has shown efficacy against tumors that express HER2 and is currently under evaluation in clinical trials. We here show that the antitumor activity of [fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan is dependent on the expression level of HER2 protein in colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines negative for HER2 amplification. We established isogenic CRC cell lines that express various levels of HER2 protein in the absence of HER2 amplification, and we found that cells that express HER2 at a high level were sensitive to [fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan but not to conventional HER2-targeted therapies. Furthermore, [fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan manifested a bystander killing effect both in vitro and in vivo, with cells essentially negative for HER2 expression also being killed in the presence of HER2-expressing cells, an effect that has the potential to overcome heterogeneity of HER2 expression in CRC tumors. Our results thus suggest that [fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan warrants further study as a potential treatment for CRC tumors that express HER2 protein in the absence of HER2 amplification.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine + oxaliplatin (CapeOX) + zolbetuximab and 5-FU + oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) + zolbetuximab are recommended as first-line treatments for chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2-negative, CLDN18.2-positive advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer. However, no prospective trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 + oxaliplatin (SOX) + zolbetuximab. This study is planned as a non-comparative, prospective, randomized phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOX + zolbetuximab in chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2-negative, CLDN18.2-positive advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized study will enroll patients ≥ 18 years old with histologically confirmed HER2-negative, CLDN18.2-positive (IHC defined as ≥ 75% of tumour cells showing moderate-to-strong membranous CLDN18 staining) advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer. Participants (n = 140) will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either SOX + zolbetuximab or CapeOX + zolbetuximab. The primary endpoint is the 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate, with a threshold of 17% and an expected rate of 33% for SOX + zolbetuximab. To account for a 10% deviation risk, the target enrollment for each arm is 70 patients. CapeOX + zolbetuximab will serve as a prospective observational arm without hypothesis testing. Secondary endpoints will include PFS, overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, time to response, and safety. The enrollment period is 2 years, followed by a 2-year observation period. DISCUSSION: Since replacing capecitabine with S-1 should provide the same level of therapeutic efficacy, SOX + zolbetuximab may be increasingly used to treat advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer in Asian countries. Verifying the efficacy and safety of SOX + zolbetuximab is thus an important task. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol has been registered at the website of the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (JRCT), Japan (protocol ID jRCTs031240510, protocol version: 1.11) on November 26, 2024. The details are available at https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/.

Cancer genomic medicine interprets genetic information for diagnosis and treatment. It requires an organized team of experts from various fields to discuss treatment recommendations at a molecular tumor board (MTB). It is also important to track patient outcomes based on these decisions and seamlessly incorporate them into future discussions at the MTB. We developed a system to manage the MTB efficiently. Using this system, we followed the outcome and prognosis of 1643 patients whose treatment was discussed at the MTB and evaluated the utility of a realistic comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test. Treatment recommendations were made for 240 patients (14% of the total cases). Of these, 118 (7% of the total) were treated with the drugs recommended by the MTB. The cancer type with the highest percentage of patients in which treatment recommendations were made and drugs were administered was thyroid cancer, followed by breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, and cholangiocarcinoma. While cancer-specific overall survival was inconclusive due to few cases, CGP-recommended treatment significantly extended patient survival from the CGP test date. This analysis, utilizing our patient follow-up system, suggests that CGP testing expands treatment options for a subset of patients and may improve treatment efficacy.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are essential for treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). As antibiotics (Abx) may reduce ICI efficacy, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) relate to better outcomes, we investigated their association. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 121 advanced or metastatic ESCC patients treated with ICIs, assessing outcomes based on Abx use and irAEs. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (33.9%) were in the Abx (+) group, showing a significantly shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) (2.5 vs. 6.5 months; p = 0.029) and lower disease control rate (36.8% vs. 60.9%; p = 0.0145) than those in the Abx (-) group. irAEs were less frequent in the Abx (+) group (29.3% vs. 58.8%; p = 0.0037). The positive impact of irAEs on ICI efficacy was significant in overall population [irAE(-) vs. irAE(+): PFS, 4.4 months (95% CI 2.5-5.3) vs. 8.8 months (95% CI 5.9-13.7); log-rank p = 0.001; Hazard ratio (HR) 1.76, 95% CI 1.14-2.74; p = 0.011; overall survival (OS), 10.6 months (95% CI 7.0-13.1) vs. 18.1 months (95% CI 9.2-25.9); log-rank p = 0.043; HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.01-2.55; p = 0.046] but diminished if received Abx. Notably, the Abx (-)/irAE (+) group had the best outcomes, while the Abx (+)/irAE (-) group had the worst PFS (8.7 vs. 2.4 months; HR 2.07; p = 0.011) and OS (18.1 and 6.8 months; HR 1.89; p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Antibiotic use was linked to reduced ICI efficacy and fewer irAEs, suggesting impaired immune activation in ESCC patients.

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a biologically heterogeneous malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although the combination of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is now a standard first-line therapy for advanced BTC, the genomic determinants of treatment outcome have remained unclear. METHODS: We investigated the relation between genomic alterations and overall survival (OS) in BTC patients treated with first-line GC or GC + ICI using data from the Japanese Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) database. RESULTS: Among 1875 BTC patients with available OS data, genomic alterations of TP53 (53.3%), CDKN2A (25.4%), and KRAS (21.0%) were the most frequently identified and were significantly associated with inferior OS in both GC and GC + ICI groups. TP53 and KRAS mutations showed numerically higher hazard ratios (HRs) in the GC + ICI group than in the GC group (HR of 1.53 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25-1.88] vs. 1.29 [95% CI, 1.03-1.61] for TP53; HR of 1.78 [95% CI, 1.45-2.17] vs. 1.40 [95% CI, 1.07-1.83] for KRAS), whereas CDKN2A alterations showed similar effects across treatments. The TP53/KRAS double-mutant subgroup showed the poorest survival outcome, with shorter median OS on GC + ICI than on GC (11.8 vs. 15.9 months; HR, 1.47 [95% CI, 0.99-2.18]), although no significant interaction between treatment and double-mutant status was observed (interaction P = 0.1655). CONCLUSION: TP53 and KRAS co-mutation may identify a molecular subset of BTC with poor prognosis in the context of GC + ICI.

BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC) presents significant therapeutic challenges due to its molecular heterogeneity. Previous studies suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may enhance the efficacy of subsequent HER2-targeted therapy. However, evidence suggesting an optimal sequence for nivolumab and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) treatment is limited. This exploratory analysis of EN-DEAVOR evaluated the effectiveness and safety of administering T-DXd relative to the timing of prior ICI administration. METHODS: This study assessed real-world outcomes of T-DXd in patients with HER2-positive AGC stratified by prior ICI exposure: within 2 months of nivolumab (Group A), >2 months (Group B), and no prior nivolumab (Group C). The primary effectiveness endpoints included real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Safety endpoints included grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Among 311 eligible patients, Group A showed the longest median rwPFS (n = 63; 6.9 months) compared with Group B (n = 63; 4.6 months) and Group C (n = 185; 4.2 months). The risk of progression was significantly lower in Group A compared with Group B (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.6 [0.4-0.9]; P = .0074). ORR was numerically highest in Group A (54.9%) versus Group B (30.8%) and Group C (43.4%). More patients in Group B (58.7%) experienced grade ≥ 3 AEs than in Group A (50.8%) and Group C (43.8%). No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating T-DXd within 2 months post-ICI may enhance therapeutic efficacy in HER2-positive AGC without affecting safety, supporting a potential sequencing option after ICI therapy.

We analysed the differences in bacterial composition between 475 Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer (median age, 70 years; median BMI 20.0) and 106 healthy individuals using a comprehensive metagenome shotgun analysis. Among the patients with advanced gastric cancer, 71% were male, 37% had relapsed, and 55.5% previously underwent gastrectomy. Bifidobacterium, Anaerostipes, and Parabacteroides were predominant in healthy individuals, whereas Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, and Odoribacter were predominant in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Additionally, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis showed that butanoate and pyruvate metabolism was enriched in healthy individuals, whereas factors, such as ABC transporters and ribosomes, were enriched in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Cluster analysis broadly classified patients with advanced gastric cancer and healthy individuals into two clusters; however, clustering using pathway data more clearly classified patients with advanced gastric cancer and healthy individuals than clustering using flora analysis. Moreover, healthy individuals showed higher bacterial flora diversity than those with advanced gastric cancer. Although the dataset we used was limited and may be difficult to generalise, we identified some molecular characteristics and functional pathways of the microbial genera within the intestines of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: We investigated treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) after nivolumab first-line therapy approval in Japan in 2021. METHODS: This retrospective study used data from the Medical Data Vision database. Treatment patterns were described. Overall time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) from the start of each line was estimated. RESULTS: Among 11,276 included patients, 1589 received anti-HER2+chemotherapy (Cx) at any line and regarded as HER2-positive AGC (anti-HER2+Cx group). Among the other, 9687 who presumably had HER2-negative AGC, 5722 received nivolumab+Cx at first-line (Nivo+Cx group), and 3965 received Cx alone at first-line (Cx group). Nivolumab+S-1+oxaliplatin (4,104/11,276; 36.4%) was the most common first-line regimen. The most common second-line and third-line regimens were ramucirumab+paclitaxel (PTX) (or NabPTX) (3092/4345; 71.2%) and nivolumab (490/1712; 28.6%). Median overall TTD from start of first-line therapy was 13.3, 10.5, and 6.8 months in anti-HER2+Cx, Nivo+Cx, and Cx groups. Median overall TTD from start of second-line therapy was 6.2, 3.5, and 4.9 months with ramucirumab combination therapy, ramucirumab monotherapy, and other therapies. CONCLUSIONS: After first-line nivolumab was introduced for AGC in Japan, treatment patterns remained consistent with Japanese Gastric Cancer Association guidelines. Optimizing sequential therapy, including nivolumab at first-line and ramucirumab combination at second-line, may improve outcomes.

PURPOSE: Cetuximab plus paclitaxel (CET + PTX) is frequently administered after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC). However, the relation between responses to these two treatment lines has remained unclear. We aimed to clarify this relation and its potential mechanisms, focusing on the patients treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and subsequent CET + PTX. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with R/M-HNSCC who received pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and subsequent CET + PTX at Tohoku University Hospital between April 2020 and November 2025. Clinical outcomes of CET + PTX were assessed according to response to prior pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. Gene expression and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses of pretreatment tumor samples, as well as HNSCC cell-based assays, were performed. RESULTS: This study included 30 patients. The overall response rate (ORR) to subsequent CET + PTX was 57%. The ORR and progression-free survival (PFS) of CET + PTX were significantly greater in patients who showed progressive disease on pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy than in responders (P < .01). Gene expression analyses revealed enrichment of Janus kinase (JAK)-STAT signaling pathways in pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy nonresponders who responded to CET + PTX. Consistently, high tumor expression of phosphorylated STAT3 was observed exclusively in this subgroup by IHC. CET sensitivity across HNSCC cell lines correlated with STAT3 phosphorylation. CONCLUSION: Responses to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and subsequent CET + PTX were inversely associated in R/M-HNSCC. Activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, particularly STAT3 phosphorylation, may identify tumors resistant to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy but sensitive to CET + PTX, thereby guiding post-ICI treatment selection.

BACKGROUND: FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab improved efficacies and increased some adverse events in untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), compared with the doublet plus bevacizumab. The clinical outcomes of ramucirumab (RAM) in combination with FOLFIRI or FOLFOXIRI as a first-line treatment are unknown. In this randomized phase II study (WJOG9216G), we compared the efficacy and safety of these regimens to determine which is more promising. METHODS: Patients with untreated mCRC were randomly assigned to the FOLFIRI-RAM or FOLFOXIRI-RAM arms. The primary endpoint was a confirmed objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included early tumor shrinkage (ETS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: In total, 122 patients were randomized. The confirmed ORR was 59.3% and 60.3% in the FOLFIRI-RAM and FOLFOXIRI-RAM arms, respectively (odds ratio 1.04; P = 0.91). With a median follow-up period of 42.1 and 40.4 months, PFS was comparable between the FOLFIRI-RAM and FOLFOXIRI-RAM arms (median, 11.5 and 10.5 months). ETS rate (71.2% and 52.4%) and OS (median, 32.6 and 28.2 months) were significantly better in the FOLFIRI-RAM arm than in the FOLFOXIRI-RAM arm. The major grade ≥ 3 adverse events in the FOLFIRI-RAM and FOLFOXIRI-RAM arms were neutropenia (44.1% and 72.6%), anorexia (3.4% and 14.5%), and febrile neutropenia (3.4% and 11.3%). CONCLUSIONS: FOLFOXIRI plus RAM was not superior to FOLFIRI plus RAM in terms of efficacy, including ORR, in patients with untreated mCRC. Instead, first-line FOLFIRI plus RAM showed clinical efficacy and safety profiles comparable to those of doublet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the impact of an institutional certification system that was newly introduced by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association on short-term surgical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer using data from the National Clinical Database. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of distal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy procedures performed between January 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. The institutions were classified into three categories: type A, type B, and non-certified institutions, in decreasing order of certification stringency. The primary outcome was the incidence of grade ≥ IIIa postoperative complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The secondary outcome was surgery-related mortality. Logistic regression with risk adjustment, estimated using generalized estimating equations, was used to account for intra-cluster correlation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the risks of distal gastrectomy-related complications across the three institution types. However, type A- (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.49) and type B-certified institutions (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.49-0.71) had a significantly lower mortality risk than non-certified ones. On the other hand, Type A- (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.44) and type B-certified institutions (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.33) had higher risks of postoperative total gastrectomy-related complications than non-certified ones. Nevertheless, type A- (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.29-0.58) and type B-certified institutions (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.88) had significantly lower surgery-related mortality risks than non-certified ones. CONCLUSIONS: Certified institutions demonstrated lower surgical mortality risks, highlighting the benefits of the certification system and the importance of institutional quality.

Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a hereditary cancer-predisposing disorder caused by germline pathogenic variants in the TP53 gene. Attenuated LFS represents a clinically milder form characterized by lower penetrance and later tumor onset, evading standard diagnostic criteria. We report a case of a 36-year-old Japanese woman who presented with hematochezia and was diagnosed with metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma. After failure of the first- to third-line chemotherapies, plasma-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed. The assay revealed a TP53 p.R181H variant (allele frequency: 0.512), KRAS p.G12D variant, PIK3CA p.E545K variant, and a CTNNB1 splicing variant. Family history included multiple gastrointestinal and hematological malignancies in first- and second-degree relatives. Germline testing confirmed heterozygosity of TP53 p.R181H, a temperature-sensitive variant suggested to have reduced penetrance. Notably, this variant is relatively common in European populations but rare in East Asian cohorts. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported East Asian case of attenuated LFS associated with the TP53 p.R181H variant. This case underscores the broader phenotypic spectrum of LFS. With the growing use of CGP, LFS may be identified more frequently in East Asia, potentially revealing attenuated LFS missed by traditional diagnostic criteria.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal dissemination remains a challenge with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. We aimed to compare solvent-based paclitaxel (sb-PTX) + ramucirumab (RAM) vs. nanoparticle-albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) + RAM as second-line therapy for unresectable or recurrent GC with peritoneal dissemination. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre phase 2 trial was conducted at 58 centres within the West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG) in Japan. Eligible participants were patients with histologically-confirmed GC with peritoneal dissemination refractory or intolerant to first-line therapy. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive sb-PTX + RAM or nab-PTX + RAM. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and protocol-specified biomarker analyses including the assessment of stromal caveolin-1 (Cav-1) expression by immunohistochemistry on archival tumour specimens. The data cutoff for the analysis presented herein was January 27, 2021. This trial was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031180022). FINDINGS: Between Oct 1, 2018, and Jan 27, 2020, 105 patients were assigned to sb-PTX + RAM (n = 53) or nab-PTX + RAM (n = 52). Median follow-up was 18.1 months. Median OS was 8.1 months with sb-PTX + RAM and 7.2 months with nab-PTX + RAM (HR [nab-PTX + RAM vs. sb-PTX + RAM], 0.960; 95% CI, 0.621-1.484; P = 0.631). Median PFS was 5.1 vs. 3.9 months (HR [nab-PTX + RAM vs. sb-PTX + RAM], 0.965; 95% CI, 0.642-1.450; P = 0.893). ORR was 20.7% vs. 20.0% (P = 0.993), and DCR was 77.4% vs. 63.5% (P = 0.150), with sb-PTX + RAM and nab-PTX + RAM. Grade≥3 neuropathy occurred in 7.5% with sb-PTX + RAM and 17.6% with nab-PTX + RAM, and febrile neutropenia in 11.3% vs. 5.9%. In biomarker analysis, OS and PFS improved stepwise with increasing Cav-1 expression in patients receiving nab-PTX + RAM (P = 0.007, P = 0.012); no such association was observed with sb-PTX + RAM. Among patients with high stromal Cav-1 expression (IHC score 3+), nab-PTX + RAM showed some evidence of improved OS compared with sb-PTX + RAM (HR [nab-PTX + RAM vs. sb-PTX + RAM], 0.371; 95% CI, 0.130-1.060; P = 0.055). The interaction between Cav-1 expression and treatment arm showed a non-significant trend (HR for interaction, 0.364; 95% CI, 0.115-1.152; P = 0.086), consistent with this finding. INTERPRETATION: Treatment with nab-PTX + RAM did not meet the prespecified threshold (HR < 0.90) for promising efficacy in patients with GC and peritoneal dissemination. High stromal Cav-1 expression was associated with improved efficacy of nab-PTX + RAM. Future studies should prospectively validate the predictive value of stromal Cav-1 in patients receiving nab-PTX + RAM. FUNDING: Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.

INTRODUCTION: Angiomyolipoma (AML) is a mesenchymal tumor composed of blood vessels, smooth muscle, and adipose tissue, and is generally considered benign. However, epithelioid angiomyolipoma (eAML) is a rare and aggressive variant with metastatic potential. Molecular characterization utilizing the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-mTOR pathway is beneficial in advanced disease. This report describes the clinical course, histopathological findings, and molecular analysis of a patient with metastatic eAML. METHODS: A 59-year-old Japanese man with no personal or family history of tuberous sclerosis (TSC) was admitted to the hospital with gradually worsening back pain and initially diagnosed with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). He underwent nephrectomy, followed by hepatic recurrence treated with pazopanib and subsequent axitinib. Both were discontinued due to intolerance, and the two remaining liver metastases were surgically resected. Histopathological examination of the resected lesions revealed eAML. After several recurrences and resections, unresectable hepatic and pulmonary metastases eventually developed. RESULTS: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) using the resected liver metastasis specimen identified two somatic TSC2 mutations: a frameshift mutation (p. P677fs*21; variant allele frequency [VAF] 0.0789) and a nonsense mutation (p. S1469*; VAF 0.0736), suggesting biallelic loss of TSC2. Based on these findings, everolimus, a mammalian/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, was recommended, which markedly reduced the size of the metastatic lesions and was continued for 24 months until disease progression without severe adverse events. DISCUSSION: This case suggests that CGP can help identify actionable alterations in eAML, such as TSC2 mutations, to guide personalized therapy with mTOR inhibitors.

This case study describes the clinical course of a 39-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer harboring a germline PALB2 mutation who was treated with a PARP inhibitor. She initially demonstrated a clinical benefit with reduced tumor markers and favorable imaging findings. However, disease progression occurred after eight months. Liquid biopsy-based genomic profiling identified three PALB2 reversion mutations that restored homologous recombination, leading to treatment resistance. The case illustrates both the therapeutic potential of PARP inhibitors in PALB2-mutated cancers and the emergence of resistance. It emphasizes the importance of liquid biopsy-based genomic profiling for understanding tumor evolution and guiding treatment strategies.

A central venous (CV) port is an important device for cancer treatment, as it enables safe venous access. We herein report the case of an 82-year-old man with recurrent gastric cancer who experienced J-tip spring guidewire entrapment caused by the Chiari network during CV port implantation. The guidewire was pulled away, with a piece of tissue at its tip. The tissue comprised cardiomyocytes, stratified collagenous fibers, and elastic fibers. The condition was diagnosed as a Chiari network. Based on our experience, operators should be aware of the risk of Chiari network involvement even with a normal transthoracic echocardiogram result.

Abstract The number of deaths from colorectal cancer in Japan continues to rise, with over 50,000 deaths recorded in 2018. In the 2024 edition, revisions to all aspects of treatment were undertaken, with corrections and additions made based on knowledge gained since the 2022 version (drug therapy) and the 2019 version (other treatments). The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2024 for the treatment of colorectal cancer have been prepared to present standard treatment strategies, reduce disparities among institutions, avoid both unnecessary and insufficient treatment, and enhance mutual understanding between healthcare professionals and patients by making these guidelines accessible to the public. These guidelines were developed through consensus by the JSCCR Guideline Committee, following a careful review of evidence retrieved from literature searches and considering the medical insurance system and actual clinical practice in Japan. Therefore, these guidelines serve as a tool for managing colorectal cancer in real-world clinical settings. More specifically, they can be used to support obtaining informed consent from patients and selecting the most appropriate treatment method for each patient. Controversial topics were selected as clinical questions, and recommendations were provided. Each recommendation is accompanied by an evidence classification and a recommendation category, both based on consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. This article presents the English version of the JSCCR guidelines 2024.

BACKGROUND: In the phase 3 FRESCO-2 study, fruquintinib plus best supportive care (BSC) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus placebo plus BSC in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We present the results of a FRESCO-2 post hoc subgroup analysis evaluating outcomes of patients enrolled in Japan. METHODS: In FRESCO-2, patients had previously received all standard chemotherapies, anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR therapies if indicated, and had progressed on, or were intolerant to trifluridine-tipiracil and/or regorafenib. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive fruquintinib 5 mg or matching placebo by mouth once daily on days 1-21 in 28-day cycles, plus BSC. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: Of the 56 patients enrolled in Japan, 40 (71.4%) and 16 (28.6%) were randomized to fruquintinib and placebo, respectively. OS was improved with fruquintinib versus placebo (median 6.9 vs. 5.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19 - 0.92). PFS was also improved with fruquintinib versus placebo (median 3.6 vs. 1.8 months; HR, 0.27; 95% CI 0.13 - 0.56). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with fruquintinib versus placebo was 71.8% versus 29.4%; the most common grade ≥ 3 TEAEs with fruquintinib were hypertension (23.1%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (17.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Fruquintinib improved OS and PFS versus placebo in FRESCO-2 patients enrolled in Japan and demonstrated a manageable safety profile. Results from the Japan subgroup were consistent with the global FRESCO-2 population, thus supporting fruquintinib as a novel treatment option for patients in Japan with refractory mCRC. CLINICAL TRIAL DETAILS: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04322539.

Introduction Preclinical studies have demonstrated the potential of Lentinula edodes mycelium (L.E.M.) extract for managing oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN). The efficacy and optimal dosage of L.E.M. for OIPN remain uncertain. We evaluated the efficacy and safety as well as the optimal dosage of L.E.M. extract for OIPN in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods After curative resection, we used a 1:1:1 ratio to randomly assign patients with CRC with persistent OIPN (defined by a visual analogue scale [VAS] numbness score ≥40 mm) to the low-dose (L.E.M. 300 mg twice daily [bid]), high-dose (L.E.M. 900 mg bid), and placebo groups. The primary endpoint of this double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial was the reduction in the VAS numbness score in the low-dose group compared with that in the placebo group at 12 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) and quality of life were evaluated. Results Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to the placebo (n = 15), low-dose (n = 15), and high-dose (n = 15) groups. At 12 weeks, no significant difference in the reduction of the VAS numbness score was observed when the low-dose and placebo groups were compared (−12.20 [95% confidence interval {CI}; −34.54 to 10.14] vs. −10.69 [95% CI; −27.07 to 5.69]; p = 0.83); however, the high-dose group showed a favorable trend compared with the placebo group (−12.20 vs. −29.32 [95% CI; −53.4 to −5.2]; p = 0.06). Grade 3 or higher AEs related to the intervention were not observed. Discussion High-dose L.E.M. extract resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement in VAS numbness scores without severe toxicity. Clinical Trial Registration https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs051210085, identifier jRCTs051210085.

Cancer is a systemic disease rather than a localized pathology and is characterized by widespread effects, including whole-body exhaustion and chronic inflammation. A thorough understanding of cancer pathophysiology requires a systemic approach that accounts for the complex interactions between cancer cells and host tissues. To explore these dynamics, we employed a comprehensive metabolomic analysis of plasma samples from patients with either esophageal or head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Plasma samples from 149 patients were metabolically profiled and correlated with clinical data. Among the metabolites identified, lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) emerged as the sole biomarker strongly correlated with prognosis. A significant reduction in plasma LPC levels was linked to poorer overall survival. Plasma LPC levels demonstrated minimal correlation with patient-specific factors, such as tumor size and general condition, but showed significant association with the response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Proteomic and cytokine analyses revealed that low plasma LPC levels reflected systemic chronic inflammation, characterized by high levels of inflammatory proteins, the cytokines interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α, and coagulation-related proteins. These findings indicate that plasma LPC levels may be used as reliable biomarkers for predicting prognosis and evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with SCC.

PURPOSE: Continuous use of antiangiogenic agents has demonstrated survival benefits in various cancers. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus irinotecan with irinotecan monotherapy as a third- or later-line treatment for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal cancer (AGC) that has progressed on previous ramucirumab-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients age 20 years and older with AGC, who had experienced disease progression during ramucirumab-based chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive either ramucirumab plus irinotecan or irinotecan monotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) expecting a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 (a power of 80% and a significance level of one-sided 0.05). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, disease control rate (DCR), and safety. RESULTS: Between February 2017 and August 2022, 402 patients in Japan were randomly assigned to receive ramucirumab plus irinotecan (n = 202) or irinotecan monotherapy (n = 200). The median OS was 9.4 months in the combination arm and 8.5 months in the monotherapy arm, with an adjusted HR of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.12; P = .49). PFS was improved (median, 3.8 v 2.8 months; HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89]; P = .002), while the DCR was significantly better (64.4% v 52.1%; P = .03) with the combination therapy. The adverse events of the combination therapy were manageable. CONCLUSION: Adding ramucirumab to irinotecan does not provide a significant advantage in OS over irinotecan alone in patients with AGC who have progressed during ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy.

Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients with severe peritoneal metastases (SPM), characterized by massive ascites and/or inadequate oral intake, have a poor prognosis with the median overall survival of around 7 months, even when treated with fluorouracil/l-leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6), despite being a treatment options for these patients demonstrated in the WJOG10517G study. However, these patients were excluded from pivotal Phase III trials, including the CheckMate 649 study, which demonstrated the benefit of adding nivolumab to mFOLFOX6, due to tumor-related complications. Given the lack of data on the efficacy and safety of combining nivolumab with mFOLFOX6 for AGC patients with SPM, we initiated a Phase II study to evaluate this combination. The primary endpoint was the 1-year survival rate.Clinical trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs) 041220164.

PURPOSE: Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer (AGC), accounting for 5%-6% of all AGC cases, has shown an enhanced responsiveness to immunotherapy. We performed a single-arm phase II study to evaluate the combination of nivolumab (NIVO) and low-dose (LD) ipilimumab (IPI) for first-line treatment of MSI-H AGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with MSI-H AGC received NIVO (240 mg once every 2 weeks) and IPI (1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and biomarker analysis. MSI-H status was confirmed with an MSI-IVD Kit (Falco). RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled. The ORR was 62.1% (95% CI, 42.3 to 79.3), with a complete response rate of 10.3%. The DCR was 79.3% (95% CI, 60.3 to 92.0). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 93.1% of patients, with those of grade ≥3 manifesting in 37.9% of patients. At the data cutoff (median follow-up of 9.0 months), treatment had been discontinued in 21 patients, with such discontinuation being due to TRAEs in 12 (41.4%) patients. However, after exclusion of one patient with progressive disease, the remaining 11 patients showed long-term antitumor efficacy after treatment discontinuation (range of response duration, 0.9+ to 15.6+ months). The median PFS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 13.7 months to not reached [NR]) and the median OS was NR (95% CI, 13.7 months to NR), with a 12-month OS rate of 79.5%. CONCLUSION: NIVO plus LD-IPI showed robust and durable antitumor efficacy as a first-line treatment for MSI-H AGC. Although TRAEs often led to treatment discontinuation, treatment efficacy was subsequently sustained in most patients.

BACKGROUND: To improve the prognosis of clinically resectable type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer (GC), we performed a phase I/II study of neoadjuvant-radiotherapy combined with S-1 plus cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Phase I, with a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, was performed to define the recommended phase II dose. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in phase II. The three dose levels were as follows: level 0, S-1 60 mg/m2 on days 1-14 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1; level 1, S-1 80 mg/m2 on days 1-14 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1; and level 2, S-1 80 mg/m2 on days 1-14 and 22-35, plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22. The starting dose was level 1. Radiotherapy was delivered at a total dose of 40 Gy in fractions for 4 weeks. RESULTS: A total of six patients were enrolled in the phase I study. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed at level 2; level 1 was established as the recommended phase II dose. In phase II, 20 patients were enrolled from November 2012 to April 2018. Grade 3/4 leukopenia and nonhematologic adverse events occurred in 35% and 5% of the patients, respectively. In total, 19 patients underwent the protocol surgery; 2 (10.5%) achieved a pathological complete response. There were no treatment-related deaths; 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 70.0 and 50.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin is a safe and promising treatment for clinically resectable type 4 or large type 3 GC.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of adjuvant chemotherapy after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer remains unknown. This phase 2 study evaluated adjuvant chemotherapy with modified 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) after lung metastasectomy. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included colorectal adenocarcinoma, first curative resection of ≤4 lung metastases, and no prior chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6. The primary endpoint was the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, with the expectation of 50% (threshold, 35%) and a planned sample size of 100 (90% power; alpha error, 5%). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled between July 2011 and July 2014; patient enrollment was closed prematurely because of slow accrual. Excluding four ineligible patients, the characteristics of the 48 patients in the efficacy analysis set were a median age of 62 years (range, 43-75 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 in 45 patients, prior resection of extrathoracic metastasis in four patients, and postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen within normal range in 43 patients; the status of lung metastasis was single in 34 patients, unilateral in 40 patients, and metachronous in 41 patients; and a disease-free interval between primary tumor resection and diagnosis of lung metastasis of <2 years in 33 patients. The 5-year OS rate was 85.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.4%-92.6%), and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 60.2% (95% CI, 44.9%-72.4%). Forty-one of the 52 patients (78.8%) in the safety analysis set completed 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6. Grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (50.0%), fatigue (7.7%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (7.7%), and other (<5%). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 is feasible, and may be effective after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are standard therapies for EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, their efficacy is inconsistent. Secondary mutations in the EGFR or other genes that lead to resistance have been identified, but resistance mechanisms have not been fully identified. Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a hallmark of cancer and results in genetic diversity. In this study, we demonstrated by transcriptomic analysis that CIN activates the cGAS-STING signaling pathway, which leads to EGFR-TKI refractoriness in a subset of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. Furthermore, EGFR-mutated H1975dnMCAK cells, which frequently underwent chromosomal mis-segregation, demonstrated refractoriness to the EGFR-TKI osimertinib compared to control cells. Second, H1975dnMCAK cells exhibited activation of cGAS-STING signaling and its downstream signaling, including tumor-promoting cytokine IL-6. Finally, chromosomally unstable EGFR-mutated NSCLC exhibited enhanced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Blockade of cGAS-STING-TBK1 signaling reversed EMT, resulting in restored susceptibility to EGFR-TKIs in vitro and in vivo. These results suggest that CIN may lead to the activation of cGAS-STING signaling in some EGFR-mutated NSCLC, resulting in EMT-associated EGFR-TKI resistance.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI)-high tumors represent a distinct, small-fraction subtype in esophagogastric junction cancer or gastric cancer (GC), yet their clinical significance remains poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and clinicopathological features of chemotherapy-naïve metastatic or recurrent MSI-high GC as a prescreening study for a phase II trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab. METHODS: Key inclusion criteria included metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of GC, ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, and no prior systemic therapy for metastatic or recurrent disease. MSI status was tested using multiplex PCR fragment analysis (MSI Testing Kit, FALCO). The primary endpoint was the prevalence of MSI-high GC. RESULTS: Between October 2020 and October 2022, 930 eligible patients from 75 centers in Japan were analyzed. The prevalence of MSI-high GC was 5.6% (95% CI 4.2-7.3). MSI-high GC was more frequently observed in females than males (9.6% vs 3.8%, p < 0.001), patients aged ≥ 70 years compared to those < 70 years (8.0% vs 2.8%, p < 0.001), in the lower stomach than other locations (10.5% vs 3.2%, p < 0.001), HER2-negative tumors than HER2-positive tumors (6.5% vs 1.8%, p = 0.02), and in patients without liver metastasis than those with liver metastasis (6.9% vs 2.2%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MSI-high tumors among chemotherapy-naïve patients with unresectable GC was 5.6%. These tumors were associated with female sex, older age, lower stomach, HER2-negative, and absence of liver metastasis. These findings would help assuming MSI-high tumors and may have significant implications for clinical practice and studies targeting this GC subtype.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Irinotecan is a key drug for patients with advanced gastric cancer. We assessed the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with trastuzumab and irinotecan in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive chemotherapy-refractory gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included unresectable or recurrent HER2-positive gastric cancer patients who were refractory to at least one regimen of chemotherapy. Irinotecan was administered at a dose of 150 mg/m2 every 2 weeks, and trastuzumab at a dose of 8 mg/kg on day 1 of the first cycle, followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR). The secondary endpoints were adverse events (AEs), overall response rate (ORR), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled, of whom 18 previously received a single chemotherapy regimen whereas 12 received two or more regimens. As one patient withdrew before the study treatment, 29 patients were assessable for efficacy and safety. The DCR was 65.5%, and the ORR was 20.7%. The median PFS and OS were 3.7 and 7.5 months, respectively. The major grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (24%), anemia (24%), leukopenia (21%), anorexia (11%), fatigue (14%), hypoalbuminemia (24%), and hypokalemia (14%). One treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that irinotecan plus trastuzumab is feasible with modest potential efficacy against chemotherapy-refractory advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer.

DESTINY-CRC01 (NCT03384940) was a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study that investigated the safety and efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). The present exploratory biomarker analysis aims to investigate relationships between biomarkers and clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-positive (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ or IHC 2+ and in situ hybridization [ISH] positive) Cohort A (N = 53) of DESTINY-CRC01. Higher levels of HER2 biomarkers in baseline tissue and liquid biopsies, including HER2 status (IHC/ISH), HER2/CEP17 ratio, HER2 ISH signals, HER2 H-score, plasma HER2 (ERBB2) amplification status, HER2 adjusted plasma copy number, and HER2 extracellular domain correlate with antitumor activity (indicated by objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival) of T-DXd. Baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis suggests antitumor activity of T-DXd in patients who had baseline activating RAS, PIK3CA, or HER2 mutations detected in ctDNA.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies, with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Recent advances in cancer genomic analysis enable the identification of actionable gene alterations, opening new opportunities for personalized therapy. Among these, homologous recombination DNA repair (HRR) gene alterations are associated with distinct biological behavior, favorable prognosis, and increased sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the prognostic impact of coexisting mutations in key driver genes-KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4-within HRR-altered PDAC remains poorly understood. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed PDAC patients who underwent genomic profiling testing with FoundationOne® CDx between June 2019 and December 2021 through the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) database. We compared the prevalence and prognostic significance of key gene alterations between HRR-altered and HRR-wild-type (WT) tumors. RESULTS: Of 2,381 PDAC patients, 274 (11.5%) harbored HRR alterations. These patients showed significantly longer overall survival (OS) than those with HRR-WT tumors (HR = 0.66, p = 0.002). The frequencies of KRAS, TP53, and CDKN2A mutations were less frequent in HRR-altered tumors. TP53 mutation was independently associated with poorer OS across both HRR subgroups, while CDKN2A alteration was a poor prognostic factor in HRR-WT tumors. Interestingly, SMAD4 alteration was linked to improved survival in the HRR-altered group. CONCLUSION: HRR-altered PDAC has a distinct genomic profile and is associated with a favorable prognosis. Our findings demonstrate that coexisting alterations are significant prognostic factors in both HRR-altered and HRR-wild-type tumors. These results highlight the clinical relevance of incorporating comprehensive genomic profiling into routine care to stratify patient prognosis better and inform individualized treatment strategies in PDAC.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of advanced gastric cancer (GC) with extensive lymph node (LN) metastasis treated with surgery alone remains poor. We conducted a multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOx) therapy in patients with advanced GC with extensive LN metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven HER2-negative or unknown gastric adenocarcinoma with paraaortic LN (PALN) metastases and/or bulky LN metastases located at the celiac axis, common hepatic artery, and/or splenic artery were included in the study. Patients received three cycles of preoperative CapeOx every 3 weeks, followed by five cycles of postoperative CapeOx after gastrectomy with D2 or D2 + including PALN dissection. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR) according to the RECIST v1.0 criteria. RESULTS: Thirty patients from 14 institutions were enrolled from September 2017 to June 2022. Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease occurred in zero, 20, eight, and one patient, respectively. One patient was not evaluated. The RR was 66.7% (90% confidence interval, 50.1-80.7%; one-sided P = 0.049). The preoperative chemotherapy completion rate and the curative resection rate were 96.7% and 93.3%, respectively. The minor (grade ≥ 1b) pathological RR was 66.7%. Grade 3 adverse events of preoperative chemotherapy included neutropenia in 3.3%, anemia in 6.7%, and anorexia in 10.0%. One treatment-related death occurred due to postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CapeOx chemotherapy showed a favorable RR, curative resection rate, and acceptable adverse events in patients with advanced GC with extensive LN metastasis. REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000028749 and jRCTs051180186.

BACKGROUND/AIM: No prospective study has evaluated salvage chemotherapy with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in patients with gastric cancer who are resistant to or intolerant of cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study was conducted at six centers in Japan, enrolling patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer resistant to or intolerant of fluoropyrimidine, cisplatin, taxane, and irinotecan. Capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was administered orally twice daily for 14 days, followed by a 7-day rest period. Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on day one. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and safety. RESULTS: The study was terminated prematurely due to poor accrual, with 12 patients enrolled. Eight patients demonstrated resistance to prior cisplatin, while four experienced unacceptable toxicity. The median age was 64 years, and eight were male. Four, six, and two patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 1, and 2, respectively. Among 10 evaluable patients, DCR was 90%, with an RR of 30%. Median PFS, TTF, and OS were 4.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI)=1.4-5.3], 4.1 months (95%CI=1.4-4.4), and 7.1 months (95%CI=2.3-10.1), respectively. The most frequently reported grade 3-4 adverse events were fatigue (20%) and hypokalemia (20%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Salvage chemotherapy with XELOX may offer clinical benefits for patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer resistant to or intolerant of cisplatin.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The combination of capecitabine and bevacizumab is a standard first-line chemotherapy regimen for vulnerable patients with unresectable colorectal cancer. However, the safety and efficacy of this regimen in Japanese patients have not been sufficiently investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II study included patients aged ≥76 years or those aged 65-75 years who were unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. Capecitabine at 2000 mg/m2/day (days 1-14) plus bevacizumab at 7.5 mg/kg (day 1) were administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, response rate, disease control rate, and toxicities. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled between July 2011 and July 2014, of whom 33 were included in the analysis. The median patient age was 78 years (range=67-86 years). A total of 28 patients had a performance status of 0 or 1, and five of 2. The median progression-free and overall survival were 10.3 (95% confidence interval=9.2-15.4) and 27.9 (95% confidence interval=24.2-50.1) months, respectively. The response and disease control rates were 30.3% and 91.0%, respectively. The major grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hypertension (n=12, 36%) and hand-foot syndrome (n=4, 12%). One patient experienced a grade 4 gastrointestinal perforation. CONCLUSION: The combination of capecitabine and bevacizumab demonstrated favorable efficacy and tolerability in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy.

Purpose The prognosis for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer (GC) is extremely poor, especially in elderly patients (≥ 75 years). To improve the prognosis of these types of GC, we performed a phase I study to determine the recommended dose (RD) of S-1 combined with neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Methods Patients with clinically resectable type 4 and large type 3 GC were enrolled to successive cohorts in a conventional 3 + 3 design. Three dose levels were designed, as follows: level 0: S-1 60 mg/m2/day on Days 1-14; level 1: S-1 80 mg/m2/day on Days 1 -14; level 2: S-1 80 mg/m2/day on Days 1-14 and Days 22-35. The starting dose was level 1. Radiotherapy was delivered at a total dose of 40 Gy in fractions for 4 weeks. Results Ten patients were enrolled from July 2014 to August 2018. Six patients were registered at level 1, and one patient developed a dose limiting toxicity as gastric stenosis (grade 3). Two of four patients enrolled at level 2 developed dose limiting toxicity (inability to receive S-1 for hematological reasons). Therefore, the RD was determined as level 1. All patients underwent the protocol surgery; one patient underwent R1 resection because of positive peritoneal washing cytology. There were no treatment-related deaths, and the pathological response rate was 80%. The 5-year overall- and progression-free survival rates were both 60.0%. Conclusion The RD was determined as level 1. A phase II trial using the RD should be initiated.

BACKGROUND: Amplification of the programmed cell death-ligand 1 gene (CD274) is highly prevalent and associated with a high response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lymphomas, and is also a potential biomarker for ICI treatment of solid tumors. However, the efficacy of ICIs for solid tumors with CD274 amplification identified by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has been unclear. We here examined ICI efficacy for solid tumors with CD274 amplification identified by CGP in a national database. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database containing 60,155 CGP test results for individuals with solid tumors. Only clinical data from patients treated with ICIs alone (not those undergoing concomitant therapy with molecularly targeted or cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents) were evaluated. We matched 48 patients in the CD274 amplification-positive group with 170 patients in the CD274 amplification-negative group in a 1:4 ratio based on tumor type, histology, treatment, and age. Overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and response rate were evaluated as treatment outcomes in the two groups. RESULTS: OS was similar in the CD274-amplified and matched CD274-non-amplified groups (median of 22.1 vs 26.3 months, respectively; HR of 0.92 with a 95% CI of 0.55 to 1.54; p=0.075). TTNT tended to be longer in the CD274-amplified group than in the matched CD274-non-amplified group (median of 16.5 vs 14.0 months; HR of 0.63 with a 95% CI of 0.37 to 1.08; p=0.091). The objective response rate was 33.3% and 18.4% (difference of 14.9%, with a 95% CI of -0.2% to 31.6%), and the disease control rate was 63.9% and 41.1% (difference of 22.8%, with a 95% CI of 5.1% to 40.4%), in the CD274-amplified and matched CD274-non-amplified groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients with solid tumors positive for CD274 amplification in this analysis is the largest to date, and our results suggest that such gene amplification may be associated with the outcome of ICI treatment in such individuals. CD274 amplification identified by CGP may therefore be a predictor of ICI efficacy for solid tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000029779.

ABSTRACT Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy against various cancers; however, there is a rising incidence of immune‐related colitis. Some cases of immune‐related colitis prove resistant to treatment, even with the administration of glucocorticoids or infliximab, and there is currently no established standard treatment for such cases. Case The patient, a 73‐year‐old male, had undergone combination therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma for 2 years, utilizing both ipilimumab (a CTLA‐4 inhibitor) and nivolumab (a PD‐1 inhibitor). Unfortunately, the treatment led to side effects, specifically immune‐related adverse event (irAE) enterocolitis. Steroid and infliximab treatment failed to improve the patient's condition. Treatment with tacrolimus was attempted, but the patient remained unresponsive. Subsequently, 45 mg of upadacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, was administered. Symptoms improved rapidly following upadacitinib administration, and endoscopy also revealed positive results. With the increasing incidence of immune‐related colitis, some patients have become resistant to treatment with glucocorticoids and infliximab. In this case, the irAE enterocolitis was improved by upadacitinib administration. Conclusion In cases where immune‐related colitis proves resistant to treatment with glucocorticoids, infliximab, or tacrolimus, upadacitinib represents a potential option as a JAK inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) was approved for the treatment of HER2-positive patients with advanced gastric cancer in Japan based on the results of the DESTINY-Gastric01 trial. This study aimed to collect real-world data and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of T-DXd. METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 20 years at the start of T-DXd administration with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of HER2-positive unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma that had worsened after chemotherapy were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Key outcomes included T-DXd treatment status, overall survival (OS), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), objective response rate and frequency of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Of the 312 patients included in the analysis, 75.3% were male, the median (range) age was 70.0 (27.0-89.0) years, 12.2% had an ECOG PS ≥ 2, 43.3% had ascites and the initial T-DXd dose was > 5.4- ≤ 6.4 mg/kg in 78.2% of patients. The median (95% confidence interval) OS, rwPFS and TTF (months) was 8.9 (8.0-11.0), 4.6 (4.0-5.1) and 3.9 (3.4-4.2), respectively. The response rate was 42.9% in patients with a target lesion. In total, 48.4% of patients experienced a grade ≥ 3 AE, 2.6% experienced grade 5 AEs and 60.9% experienced AEs leading to T-DXd dose adjustments (reduction: 36.9%, interruption: 34.0% or discontinuation: 23.7%). No new safety signals were detected. CONCLUSIONS: T-DXd was effective and had a manageable safety profile as a third- or later-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive gastric or GEJ cancer in Japanese clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000049032.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is one of the most common types of cancer in Japan. Herein, we report the efficacy and safety of E7389-LF plus the immune checkpoint inhibitor, nivolumab, from the esophageal cancer cohort of the phase 2 part of Study 120. METHODS: Eligible patients received E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m2 plus nivolumab 360 mg intravenously Q3W. The primary objective was to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR); other objectives included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of the 35 Japanese patients enrolled, 7 (20.0%) had a partial response as their best overall response, and 14 (40.0%) had stable disease. The ORR was 20.0% (95% CI 8.4-36.9). The duration of response was 5.6 months (95% CI 1.7-not estimable [NE]). The median PFS was 2.81 months (95% CI 1.31-4.17). The median OS was not reached (95% CI 6.54 months-NE). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (65.7%), pyrexia (60.0%), and leukopenia (57.1%). Select plasma endothelial cell markers levels increased from day 1 of cycle 1 and changes were pronounced between days 8-15 of each cycle. CONCLUSIONS: E7389-LF plus nivolumab showed antitumor activity in patients with unresectable and pretreated esophageal cancer and should be evaluated further in a broader population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04078295.

BACKGROUND: While advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are primarily treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), acquired resistance from specific mutations in KIT or PDGFRA frequently occurs. We aimed to assess the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a modality of therapeutic decision-making in advanced GIST. METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of SCRUM-Japan studies for advanced GIST patients. We compared patient characteristics analyzed with tissue and blood samples, assessed gene alteration profiles, and evaluated prognostic implications from ctDNA status. RESULTS: In 133 patients, tissue and blood samples were analyzed for 89 and 44 patients, respectively. ctDNA was detected in 72.7% of cases; no prior treatment or progressive disease was significantly associated with ctDNA-positivity. ctDNA-positive patients had significantly shorter progression-free survival compared with ctDNA-negative patients (hazard ratio = 3.92; P = 0.007). ctDNA genotyping revealed a complex landscape of gene alterations, characterized by multi-exonic mutations in KIT, compared with tissue-based analysis. Patients who received TKIs matched to the identified KIT mutation in ctDNA demonstrated significantly longer PFS than those with unmatched treatment (median, 8.23 vs. 2.43 months; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ctDNA-based analysis facilitates assessment of disease status and genomic profiles, thus potentially assisting in identifying optimal therapeutic strategies for advanced GIST patients.

BACKGROUND: The QUATTRO-II trial examined the efficacy and safety of capecitabine+oxaliplatin+irinotecan (CAPOXIRI)+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. 5-fluorouracil+folinic acid+oxaliplatin+irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI)+BEV in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: In this phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04097444; jRCTs041190072), patients were randomized (1:1) to FOLFOXIRI+BEV or CAPOXIRI+BEV. The induction treatment in the FOLFOXIRI+BEV/CAPOXIRI+BEV arms was continued for 8/6 cycles (maximum 12/8 cycles if feasible), and the maintenance treatment was 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin+BEV or capecitabine+BEV at the investigators' discretion. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with the two arms deemed equivalent if the hazard ratio (HR) of the point estimate was 0.80 < HR < 1.25. Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), incidence of adverse events (AEs), and patient-reported outcomes. FINDINGS: Overall, 51 and 52 patients were randomized to FOLFOXIRI+BEV and CAPOXIRI+BEV, respectively. The study met its primary endpoint; PFS at median follow-up of 23.7 months was 10.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-13.3) in the FOLFOXIRI+BEV arm vs. 10.9 months (95% CI, 9.3-14.3) in the CAPOXIRI+BEV arm (HR 1.114 [0.80 < HR < 1.25], p = 0.654). In the FOLFOXIRI+BEV vs. CAPOXIRI+BEV arms, the 2-year OS rate (95% CI) was 65.5% (49.5%-77.6%) vs. 74.3% (59.8%-84.2%), and the ORR (95% CI) was 76.5% (62.5%-87.2%) vs. 84.6% (71.9%-93.1%). Major (grade ≥3) AEs in the FOLFOXIRI+BEV vs. CAPOXIRI+BEV arms were neutropenia (68.6% vs. 40.4%), febrile neutropenia (9.8% vs. 11.5%), diarrhea (7.8% vs. 17.3%), and appetite loss (7.8% vs. 17.3%). CONCLUSION: CAPOXIRI+BEV was well tolerated with reduced hematological toxicity and efficacy comparable to those of FOLFOXIRI+BEV, providing a potentially convenient first-line treatment alternative to FOLFOXIRI+BEV in patients with mCRC. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

BACKGROUND: First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab both demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefit versus chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the CheckMate 648 trial, leading to approvals of both nivolumab-containing regimens in many countries. We report longer-term follow-up data. METHODS: This open-label, phase III trial (NCT03143153) enrolled adults with previously untreated, unresectable, advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to nivolumab plus chemotherapy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, or chemotherapy. Primary endpoints were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Hierarchical testing was performed first in patients with tumor cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of ≥1% and then in the overall population. RESULTS: A total of 970 patients were randomly assigned. After 29 months of minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus chemotherapy continued to demonstrate improvement in OS versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59 [95% CI: 0.46-0.76]) in patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1% and in the overall population (HR = 0.78 [95% CI: 0.65-0.93]) and with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy (HR = 0.62 [95% CI: 0.48-0.80]) in patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1% and in the overall population (HR = 0.77 [95% CI: 0.65-0.92]). In patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1%, nivolumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated PFS benefit versus chemotherapy (HR = 0.67 [95% CI: 0.51-0.89]); PFS benefit was not observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy (HR = 1.04 [95% CI: 0.79-1.36]). Among all treated patients (n = 936), Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 151 (49%, nivolumab plus chemotherapy), 105 (32%, nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and 110 (36%, chemotherapy) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful OS benefit versus chemotherapy with no new safety signals identified with longer follow-up, further supporting use as first-line standard treatment options for patients with advanced ESCC.

BACKGROUND: No specific biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced colitis has been established. Previously, we identified anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies in >90% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Given that a subset of ICI-induced colitis is similar to UC, we aimed to clarify the relationship between such autoantibodies and ICI-induced colitis. METHODS: Serum anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibody levels were compared between 26 patients with ICI-induced colitis and 157 controls. Endoscopic images of ICI-induced colitis were centrally reviewed. Characteristics of anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies in the ICI-induced colitis patients were compared with those of UC patients. RESULTS: Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies were found in 8/26 (30.8%) patients with ICI-induced colitis and 3/157 (1.9%) controls (P < 0.001). Patients with anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies had significantly more typical UC endoscopic features than those without the autoantibodies (P < 0.001). Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies in ICI-induced colitis patients were associated with grade ≥3 colitis (P = 0.001) and steroid resistance (P = 0.005). Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibody titers correlated with ICI-induced colitis disease activity. Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies of ICI-induced colitis exhibited similar characteristics to those of UC. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies may serve as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis, classification, risk management, and monitoring the disease activity, of ICI-induced colitis.

Molecularly targeted therapy for receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) has faced limitations in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer except for HER2-targeted agents, possibly due to inappropriate assay selection that has hindered identification of sensitive patients, in addition to coexisting genetic abnormalities as well as intratumoral heterogeneity. Immunohistochemistry of RTKs has, thus, proved largely unsuccessful for patient selection, and detection of RTK gene amplification as a true oncogenic driver is problematic given the small numbers of affected individuals. FGFR2 amplification is associated with poor prognosis in G/GEJ cancer, and immunohistochemistry of the FGFR2b protein isoform has proved effective for the detection of such FGFR2-dependent tumors. Phase III and Ib/III trials of the FGFR2-targeted antibody bemarituzumab for G/GEJ cancer overexpressing FGFR2b are ongoing based on the promising result in a phase II trial, especially in cases with an FGFR2b positivity of ≥ 10%. Challenges to EGFR- and MET-targeted therapies are being tackled with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and bispecific antibodies. CLDN18.2 is expressed in some G/GEJ tumors but lacks oncogenic driver potential, and the CLDN18.2-targeted antibody zolbetuximab prolonged the survival of CLDN18.2-positive G/GEJ cancer patients in phase III trials. Antibody-drug conjugates and ADCs that target CLDN18.2 are also being pursued for treatment of such patients. Similarly, targeting of nondriver molecules such as DKK1, TROP2, and CEACAM5 is under investigation in early-stage clinical trials. This shift in focus from target molecules with driver potential to markers for precise drug delivery should increase the number of possible targets in G/GEJ cancer.

PURPOSE: E7389-LF is a liposomal formulation of the microtubule dynamics inhibitor eribulin and has shown preliminary efficacy in the treatment of gastric cancer. Study 120, a phase Ib/II open-label study, assessed efficacy and safety of E7389-LF in combination with nivolumab, a programmed cell death (PD)-1 inhibitor. This report focuses on the gastric cancer cohort within the expansion phase. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had unresectable, measurable gastric cancer, progression following a platinum drug plus fluoropyrimidine (1L), and a taxane-containing regimen (2L). The primary objective of the expansion phase was objective response rate, secondary objectives included safety and PFS, and exploratory objectives included overall survival and biomarker evaluation. Patients received E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m2 in combination with nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks, both as intravenous infusions. Tumor responses were assessed every 6 weeks by the investigators per RECIST v1.1. Plasma and tumor biomarkers were assessed. RESULTS: In the 31 patients who received E7389-LF in combination with nivolumab, the objective response rate was 25.8% [confidence interval (CI), 11.9-44.6]. The median progression-free survival was 2.69 months (95% CI, 1.91-2.99) and median overall survival was 7.85 months (95% CI, 4.47-not estimable). The most common treatment-related TEAE of any grade were neutropenia (77.4%), leukopenia (74.2%), and decreased appetite (51.6%). E7389-LF in combination with nivolumab significantly increased CD8-positive cells at C2D1 (P = 0.039), and six of seven vascular markers and four IFNγ-related markers showed increases from C1D1. CONCLUSIONS: Promising antitumor activity was observed with E7389-LF in combination with nivolumab in patients with gastric cancer, and no new safety signals were observed, compared with either monotherapy.

Abstract Background To define the optimal chemotherapy regimen for each patient we therefore used tissue from patients to identify molecular prognostic or predictive biomarkers. Methods Endoscopic biopsy specimens from primary lesions and surgical specimens on a phase III trial in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer treated with docetaxel with cisplatin plus S-1 (DCS) or cisplatin plus S-1 (CS), were collected. We measured the mRNA expression of ERCC1 and analyzed SNPs in GSTP1 and ERCC1. Results Low ERCC1 expression was associated with favorable prognosis for overall survival, OS by multivariable analysis (P = 0.001). There were significant interactions between the two treatment arms of DCS and CS, and ERCC1 mRNA expression. In patients with low ERCC1 expression of a favorable prognosis, DCS therapy was inferior to CS (P = 0.046). In addition to GSTP1 rs1695 (HR 1.728), ERCC1 rs3212980, ERCC1 rs2298881, ERCC1 rs3212964 with high expression of ERCC1 mRNA were associated with significantly worse prognosis with regard to OS. Conclusions ERCC1 mRNA is an independent prognostic factor and predictive marker that can be used to guide the addition of docetaxel. The SNPs of ERCC1 and GSTP1 could be also prognostic or predictive factors.

BACKGROUND: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab has shown clinical benefit for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapy. However, few data have been available for patients with pretreated mCRC who are intolerant of intensive therapy (vulnerable). METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study (WJOG14520G; TWILIGHT) of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab for vulnerable patients with pretreated mCRC. Eligibility criteria included previous chemotherapy (although patients treated with all key cytotoxic agents, a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, were excluded) and intolerance of full-dose combination therapy with oxaliplatin or irinotecan at the start of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab. RESULTS: The median age of 93 evaluable patients was 79 years (range, 21-90). Intolerance of intensive therapy was attributable to an older age in 60 (65%) patients, serious concomitant disease in 24 (26%) patients, and a poor performance status in 19 (20%) patients. FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab was administered as second-line treatment in 74 (80%) patients and as third- or fourth-line treatment in 19 (20%) patients. The objective response rate was 4.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4%-12.2%), and the disease control rate was 67.9% (95% CI, 56.6%-77.8%). With a median follow-up time of 21.6 months, median overall survival and progression-free survival were 18.6 months (95% CI, 12.1-23.2) and 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.0-8.3), respectively. Neutropenia of grade ≥3 developed in 50 (54%) patients, whereas 2 (2%) patients experienced febrile neutropenia, and no treatment-related death was observed. CONCLUSION: Our data show the potential efficacy and acceptable safety profile of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab for vulnerable patients with pretreated mCRC.

BACKGROUND: Although there is insufficient evidence for the treatment of older patients with advanced gastric cancer, fluorouracil combined with platinum chemotherapy has been recognized as a standard first-line treatment for such populations in Japan despite the lack of efficacy and toxicity data. METHODS: Patients aged 75 years or older with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. S-1 plus docetaxel (docetaxel: 40 mg/m2, day 1; S-1: 80 mg/m2, days 1-14; q21 days) was repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints were safety, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and overall survival. The sample size was calculated as 30 under the hypothesis of an expected response rate of 40% and a threshold response rate of 20%, at a power of 90% and a two-sided alpha value of 5%. RESULTS: From February 2010 to January 2015, 31 patients were enrolled and assessed for efficacy and toxicity. The response rate was 45.2% (95% CI 27.3%-64.0%; p = 0.001) and it exceeded the expected response rate set at 40%. Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months, the 1-year survival rate was 58.1%, and the median survival time was 16.1 months. The major grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (58%), febrile neutropenia (13%), anemia (10%), anorexia (10%), and fatigue (6%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment for older patients is feasible and that it has promising efficacy against advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: E7389-LF is a liposomal formulation of eribulin that contributes to tumor vascular remodeling. The phase II part of this phase Ib/II study assessed the efficacy/safety of E7389-LF in combination with nivolumab in several disease cohorts; herein, we report results from the small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cohort. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with unresectable/measurable SCLC and disease progression with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with/without an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) were enrolled to receive E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m2 plus nivolumab 360 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary objective of this part was to assess the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives included assessments of safety and progression-free survival (PFS); exploratory assessments included overall survival (OS) and biomarkers. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. By the data cut-off date (May 31, 2022), 29 (85.3%) had discontinued. Efficacy/biomarker analyses included 33 patients (1 had their diagnosis changed postenrollment); the ORR of E7389-LF plus nivolumab was 24.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.1-42.3], the median PFS was 3.98 months (95% CI: 2.63-4.40), and, at a median follow-up of 10.6 months, the median OS was not reached (95% CI: not estimable). Notably, 27 of 33 patients (81.8%) had received an ICI as their prior first-line therapy. Treatment-related, treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 97.1% (any grade) and 82.4% (grade ≥3) of enrolled patients; the most common event was neutropenia. Changes in vascular and immune-related plasma markers were observed. CONCLUSIONS: E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m2 in combination with nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks showed notable antitumor activity as second-line therapy for SCLC; no new safety signals were observed compared with either agent as monotherapy. SIGNIFICANCE: This phase II part of a phase Ib/II study assessed liposomal eribulin (E7389-LF) plus nivolumab in 34 patients with pretreated SCLC; 8 of 33 evaluable patients (including 6/27 pretreated with ICIs) had objective responses. The combination was tolerable; increases in vasculature-related biomarkers tended to correlate with responses.

BACKGROUND: The TRUSTY study evaluated the efficacy of second-line trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). OBJECTIVE: This exploratory biomarker analysis of TRUSTY investigated the relationship between baseline plasma concentrations of angiogenesis-related factors and cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and the efficacy of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab in patients with mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between baseline plasma samples of patients with high and low plasma concentrations (based on the median value) of angiogenesis-related factors. Correlations between cfDNA concentrations and PFS were assessed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics (n = 65) were as follows: male/female, 35/30; median age, 64 (range 25-84) years; and RAS status wild-type/mutant, 29/36. Patients in the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-low and interleukin (IL)-8-low groups had a significantly higher DCR (risk ratio [95% confidence intervals {CIs}]) than patients in the HGF-high (1.83 [1.12-2.98]) and IL-8-high (1.70 [1.02-2.82]) groups. PFS (hazard ratio {HR} [95% CI]) was significantly longer in patients in the HGF-low (0.33 [0.14-0.79]), IL-8-low (0.31 [0.14-0.70]), IL-6-low (0.19 [0.07-0.50]), osteopontin-low (0.39 [0.17-0.88]), thrombospondin-2-low (0.42 [0.18-0.98]), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1-low (0.26 [0.10-0.67]) groups versus those having corresponding high plasma concentrations of these angiogenesis-related factors. No correlation was observed between cfDNA concentration and PFS. CONCLUSION: Low baseline plasma concentrations of HGF and IL-8 may predict better DCR and PFS in patients with mCRC receiving FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab, however further studies are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs031180122.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding treatment sequence for vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a real-world setting are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess treatment outcomes in second-line or later chemotherapy for vulnerable patients with mCRC in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Vulnerable patients with mCRC who received less intensive treatment ('vulnerable') regimens, i.e. fluoropyrimidines with or without biologics (FP), reduced-dose doublet regimens with or without biologics (Doublet), and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monotherapy (Anti-EGFR), as first-line therapy between June 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients from 15 hospitals were analyzed. The median age was 78 years (range 28-90), and 44 patients (21%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score of 2. In the entire population, the median time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were 7.6 and 21.4 months, respectively. Following the failure of first-line therapy in 195 patients, 74 (38%), 24 (12%), and 13 (7%) patients received vulnerable regimens, full-dose doublet regimens with or without biologics, and other regimens, respectively, whereas 84 (43%) received best supportive care (BSC). In patients receiving vulnerable regimens as second-line therapy, the median TTF and OS were 4.4 and 13.7 months, respectively, while response rate and disease control rate were 18% and 62%, respectively. In 84 patients who received BSC, the median OS was 3.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Second-line chemotherapy for vulnerable patients with mCRC showed clinically meaningful outcomes; however, few patients received second-line therapy, and survival among patients who received BSC was dismal.

BACKGROUND: S-1 plus docetaxel (DS) therapy followed by S-1 is the standard of care in Japan in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III gastric cancer, but long-term survival and the number of DS cycles required are unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the number of cycles of DS therapy on the 5-year survival in stage III gastric cancer in a pooled analysis of two phase II trials (OGSG0604 and OGSG1002). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed stage III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were enrolled in this pooled analysis. They received DS therapy for four or eight cycles, followed by S-1 until 1 year postgastrectomy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and the 5-year disease free survival (DFS) by the landmark analysis was evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 113 patients from the OGSG0604 and OGSG1002 trials were enrolled in this study. The landmark analysis showed a 5-year OS that was better with four to eight cycles of DS therapy than with one to three cycles of DS therapy, with the best 5-year OS of 77.4% (95% confidence interval, 66.5-90.1%) for eight cycles. The 5-year DFS was approximately 66% when four or eight cycles of DS therapy were given. CONCLUSION: Although eight cycles of DS therapy may prolong prognosis, the present study did not provide a clear conclusion as to how many DS therapy cycles are needed to improve prognosis after D2 gastrectomy for stage III gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: UMIN00000714 and UMIN000004440.

BACKGROUND: The development of triplet regimens for advanced gastric cancer is challenging. The aim of this phase I dose-escalation study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose of the combination of irinotecan, cisplatin, and S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: The 3 + 3 design was adopted. Every 4 weeks, patients received an escalating dose of intravenous irinotecan (100-150 mg/m2) on day 1 and fixed doses of intravenous cisplatin (60 mg/m2) on day 1 and oral S-1 (80 mg/m2) on days 1 to 14. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled in two dose level cohorts. In the level 1 cohort (irinotecan 100 mg/m2, cisplatin 60 mg/m2, and S-1 80 mg/m2), dose-limiting toxicity including grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in one of six patients, whereas in the level 2 cohort (irinotecan 125 mg/m2, cisplatin 60 mg/m2, and S-1 80 mg/m2), dose-limiting toxicities including grade 4 neutropenia developed in two of six patients. Thus, the level 1 and 2 doses were determined to be the recommended and maximum tolerated doses, respectively. Common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (75%; n = 9), anemia (25%; n = 3), anorexia (8%; n = 1), and febrile neutropenia (17%; n = 2). Irinotecan, cisplatin, and S-1 combination therapy achieved an overall response rate of 67% with a median progression-free survival and overall survival of 19.3 and 22.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The potential treatment efficacy of this triplet regimen in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer warrants further evaluation, especially in patients requiring intensive chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Several biomarkers have been established for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We investigated whether plasma angiogenesis factors could predict the efficacy of biologics combined with chemotherapy in first-line (1L) treatment in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC and the dynamics of plasma angiogenesis factors at progression during 1L treatment. METHODS: In this multicenter prospective observational study, serial plasma samples were prospectively collected at pretreatment and progression stages; 17 plasma angiogenesis factors were analyzed using the multiplex assay with Luminex® technology. Interactions between the pretreatment measurements and treatment groups on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with RAS wild-type were assessed using the propensity-score weighted Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: From February 2018 to September 2020, 202 patients were enrolled in the 1L cohort; 133 patients had RAS wild-type (chemotherapy plus bevacizumab [BEV group, n = 33] and plus anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies [aEGFR group, n = 100]). A trend of strong interaction on PFS was observed for interleukin-8 (IL-8) (p = 0.0752) and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) (p = 0.0156). Regarding OS, IL-8 (p = 0.0283), soluble vascular endothelial growth factor-receptor-1 (sVEGFR-1) (p = 0.0777) and sVCAM-1 (p = 0.0011) tended to differentiate the treatment effect. In 112 patients, plasma samples were evaluable for dynamic analysis (57 and 55 from the BEV and aEGFR groups, respectively). In the BEV group, six factors significantly increased during progression, whereas two decreased. In the aEGFR group, three factors significantly increased, and six decreased. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment plasma IL-8 and sVCAM-1 levels could be predictive biomarkers to distinguish BEV and anti-EGFR mAbs when combined with chemotherapy in the 1L treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC. Several plasma angiogenesis factors showed significant change at progression in 1L chemotherapy plus biologics for RAS wild-type mCRC, which are potential biomarkers for selecting an optimal angiogenesis inhibitor in second-line treatment.

BACKGROUND: S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) and capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) are standard first-line regimens for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) worldwide. We conducted a meta-analysis using individual participant data (IPD) to investigate which is more suitable. METHODS: IPD from three randomized trials were collected. In these trials, patients with AGC were randomly allocated to SP (S-1 80-120 mg for 21 days plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 (q5w)) or XP (capecitabine 2000 mg/m2 for 14 days plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (q3w)). RESULTS: In 211 eligible patients, median overall survival (OS) for SP versus XP was 13.5 and 11.7 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.787; p = 0.114), progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.2 and 5.1 months (HR, 0.767; P = 0.076), and TTF was 5.1 and 4.0 months (HR, 0.611; P = 0.001). The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events with SP or XP were neutropenia (18% vs. 29%) and anorexia (16% vs.18%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant interaction between treatment effect and performance status > 1 (HR, 0.685; P = 0.036), measurable lesion (HR, 0.709; P = 0.049), primary upper third tumor (HR, 0.539; P = 0.040), and differentiated type (HR, 0.549; interaction, 0.236; P = 0.019). For the differentiated type, OS was significantly longer in the SP group (13.2 months) than in the XP group (11.1 months) (HR, 0.549; P = 0.019). For the undifferentiated type, OS was similar in the SP group (14.2 months) and in the XP group (12.4 months) (HR, 0.868; P = 0.476). CONCLUSIONS: SP and XP were both effective and well tolerated. SP might be suitable for the pathological differentiated subtype of AGC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The HERBIS-2, HERBIS-4A, and XParTS II trials were registered with UMIN-CTR as UMIN000006105, UMIN000006755, and UMIN000006045, respectively.

Abstract Background Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) prolongs survival in the third- or later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC), esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma, and colorectal cancer. While single-arm phase II trials showed promising outcomes of FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab (RAM) as third- or later-line treatments for advanced GC or EGJ cancer, there have been no clinical trials to directly compare FTD/TPI plus RAM with FTD/TPI monotherapy. Therefore, we have started a randomised phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI plus RAM compared with FTD/TPI monotherapy as third- or later-line treatments in patients with advanced GC and EGJ adenocarcinoma. Methods This RETREVE trial (WJOG15822G) is a prospective, open-label, randomised, multicentre phase II trial comparing FTD/TPI plus RAM versus FTD/TPI monotherapy in a third- or later-line setting. Eligibility criteria include age of &gt; 20 years; performance status of 0 or 1; unresectable or recurrent gastric or EGJ adenocarcinoma; confirmed HER2 status; refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, taxane or irinotecan; refractory to RAM (not intolerant); and at least a measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1. FTD/TPI (35 mg/m² twice daily, evening of day 1 to morning of day 6 and evening of day 8 to morning of day 13) was administered orally every 4 weeks, and RAM (8 mg/kg) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety. The expected hazard ratio of PFS is set as 0.7, assuming 4-month PFS rate of 27% in FTD/TPI monotherapy and 40% in FTD/TPI plus RAM. The number of subjects was 110, with a one-sided alpha error of 0.10 and power of 0.70. Discussion This study will clarify the additional effect of RAM continuation beyond disease progression on FTD/TPI in the third- or later-line setting for patients with advanced GC or EGJ cancer. Trial registration jRCTs041220120.

BACKGROUND: Although nivolumab has a high efficacy, reliable biomarkers are needed to predict the efficacy. We evaluated the nivolumab efficacy according to the TP53 mutation in advanced gastric cancer patients enrolled in the GI-SCREEN project. METHODS: Sequence data of tumour specimens and clinicopathological information of 913 patients with advanced gastric cancer who were enrolled between April 2015 and March 2017 were obtained from the GI-SCREEN database. The follow-up information of 266 patients treated with nivolumab was also provided. RESULTS: Among 266 patients treated with nivolumab, the objective response rate (ORR) of TP53 wild type (wt) patients (24.6%) was higher than that of TP53 mutant patients (14.8%). Among TP53 mutant patients, the ORR of the frameshift type tended to be higher than the transition and transversion type (23.1%, 13.6%, and 13.0%, respectively). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was statistically longer in TP53 wt patients than in mutant patients (3.3 vs 2.1 months, HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.9). Among TP53 mutant patients, PFS was statistically longer in the frameshift type than in the transversion type. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab showed better efficacy in TP53 wt patients than in mutant patients. Among TP53 mutant patients, the frameshift type may have efficacy from nivolumab treatment.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the response rate of a phase II OGSG1602 study on panitumumab in chemotherapy-naive frail or elderly patients with RAS wild-type unresectable colorectal cancer (CRC) [Terazawa T, Kato T, Goto M, et al. Oncologist. 2021;26(1):17]. Herein, we report a survival analysis. METHODS: Patients aged ≥65 years and considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy or aged ≥76 years were enrolled. Primary tumors located from the cecum to the transverse colon were considered right-sided tumors (RSTs); those located from the splenic flexure to the rectum were considered left-sided tumors (LSTs). RESULTS: Among the 36 enrolled patients, 34 were included in the efficacy analysis, with 26 and 8 having LSTs and RSTs, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.0 [95% CI, 5.4-10.0] and 17.5 months (95% CI, 13.8-24.3), respectively. Although no significant differences existed in PFS between patients with LST and RST {6.6 (95% CI, 5.4-11.5) vs. 4.9 months [95% CI, 1.9-not available (NA), P = .120]}, there were significant differences in OS [19.3 (95% CI, 14.2-NA) vs.12.3 months (95% CI, 9.9-NA), P = .043]. CONCLUSION: Panitumumab showed favorable OS in frail or elderly patients with RAS wild-type CRC and no prior exposure to chemotherapy. Panitumumab may be optimal for patients with LSTs (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry Number UMIN000024528).

Adjuvant S-1 monotherapy is the standard of care for stage II gastric cancer (GC) after curative resection in Japan, but its efficacy for microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors has remained unknown. Among a multi-institutional cohort of patients with stage II GC who underwent R0 resection followed by S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy between February 2008 and December 2018, we assessed MSI status with an MSI-IVD Kit (Falco). MSI status was assessable for 184 (88.5%) of the 208 enrolled patients, with MSI-H being identified in 24 (13.0%) individuals. Although neither relapse-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.00, p = 0.997) nor overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.66, p = 0.488) differed between MSI-H versus microsatellite-stable (MSS) patients, MSI-H patients showed a nonsignificant but better RFS (HR = 0.34, p = 0.064) and OS (HR = 0.22, p = 0.057) than did MSS patients after adjustment for background characteristics by propensity score (PS) analysis. Gene expression analysis in the PS-matched cohort suggested that recurrence was associated with the immunosuppressive microenvironment in MSI-H tumors but with expression of cancer/testis antigen genes in MSS tumors. Our data reveal a better adjusted survival for MSI-H versus MSS stage II GC treated with S-1 adjuvant therapy, and they suggest that mechanisms of recurrence differ between MSI-H and MSS tumors.

DESTINY-CRC01 (NCT03384940) was a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 trial assessing the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed after ≥2 prior regimens; results of the primary analysis are published. Patients received T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks and were assigned to either: cohort A (HER2-positive, immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization [ISH]+), cohort B (IHC 2+/ISH-), or cohort C (IHC 1+). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review in cohort A. Secondary endpoints included ORR (cohorts B and C), duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, pharmacokinetics, and safety of T-DXd. 86 patients were enrolled (53 in cohort A, 15 in cohort B, and 18 in cohort C). Results of the primary analysis are published, reporting an ORR of 45.3% in cohort A. Here, we report the final results. No responses occurred in cohorts B or C. Median progression-free survival, overall survival, and duration of response were 6.9, 15.5, and 7.0 months, respectively. Overall serum exposure (cycle 1) of T-DXd, total anti-HER2 antibody, and DXd were similar regardless of HER2 status. Most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased neutrophil count and anemia. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis occurred in 8 patients (9.3%). These findings support the continued exploration of T-DXd in HER2-positive mCRC.

BACKGROUND: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for the treatment of various solid tumors. In gastric cancer, genes commonly harbor mutations in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway, potentially increasing sensitivity to PARPi. Pamiparib (BGB-290) is a small molecule inhibitor of PARP1 and PARP2. METHODS: The PARALLEL-303 study (NCT03427814) investigated the efficacy and safety of pamiparib 60 mg orally (PO) twice daily (BID) versus placebo PO BID as maintenance therapy in patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer that responded to platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of this double-blind, randomized, global phase 2 study was progression-free survival (PFS) (RECIST version 1.1; per investigator assessment). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS: In total, 136 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive pamiparib (n = 71) or placebo (n = 65). Median PFS was numerically longer with pamiparib versus placebo but did not reach statistical significance (3.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9, 5.3] vs. 2.1 months [95% CI: 1.9, 3.8]; hazard ratio 0.8 [95% CI: 0.5, 1.2]; p = 0.1428). Median OS was 10.2 months (95% CI: 8.7, 16.3) in the pamiparib arm versus 12.0 months (95% CI: 8.2, not estimable) in the placebo arm. Overall, 8 patients (11.3%) in the pamiparib arm and 2 patients (3.1%) in the placebo arm experienced ≥1 TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance pamiparib did not meet statistical significance for superiority versus placebo for PFS, but was well tolerated with few treatment discontinuations; no unexpected safety signals were identified.

BACKGROUND: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved the overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who had previously received standard chemotherapies; however, the clinical outcomes remain poor. OBJECTIVE: A multicenter phase II study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI plus cetuximab rechallenge. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed RAS wild-type mCRC refractory to prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody were enrolled and treated with FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12) plus cetuximab (initially 400 mg/m2, followed by weekly 250 mg/m2) every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR), expecting a target DCR of 65% and null hypothesis of 45% with 90% power and 10% one-sided alpha error. Gene alterations of RAS, BRAF, EGFR, PIK3CA, ERBB2, and MET in pre-treatment circulating tumor DNA were evaluated using the Guardant360 assay. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients (median age 60 years; left-sided tumors 91%; objective partial or complete response during the prior anti-EGFR therapy 61%) were enrolled. The DCR was 54% (80% confidence interval [CI] 44-63; P = 0.12), with a partial response rate of 3.6%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.4 months (95% CI 2.1-3.7). In the circulating tumor DNA analysis, patients without any alterations of the six genes (n = 20) demonstrated higher DCR (75% vs. 39%; P = 0.02) and longer PFS (median 4.7 vs. 2.1 months; P < 0.01) than those with any gene alterations (n = 33). The most common grade 3/4 hematologic adverse event was neutropenia (55%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: FTD/TPI plus cetuximab rechallenge did not demonstrate clinically meaningful efficacy in all mCRC patients, but might be beneficial for the molecularly selected population.

BACKGROUND: The clinical value of soluble forms of programmed cell death-1 (sPD-1), PD ligand 1 (sPD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (sCTLA-4) for gastric cancer (GC) patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy has remained unknown. METHODS: Blood samples collected before nivolumab treatment from 439 GC patients enrolled in the DELIVER (Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organisation GC-08) trial were analysed for sPD-1, sPD-L1 and sCTLA-4. Corresponding baseline clinical data were also retrieved. RESULTS: Higher plasma levels of sPD-1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.27, p = 0.020), sPD-L1 (HR = 1.86, p < 0.001) and sCTLA-4 (HR = 1.33, p = 0.008) were significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS), whereas only higher sPD-L1 levels was significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival (HR = 1.30, p = 0.008). The sPD-L1 concentration was significantly associated with the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) (p < 0.001), but both sPD-L1 (HR = 1.67, p < 0.001) and GPS (HR = 1.39, p = 0.009 for GPS 0 versus 1; HR = 1.95, p < 0.001 for GPS 0 versus 2) were independently associated with OS. Patients with a GPS of 0 and low sPD-L1 thus showed the longest OS (median, 12.0 months) and those with a GPS of 2 and high sPD-L1 showed the shortest OS (median, 3.1 months), yielding a HR of 3.69 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Baseline sPD-L1 levels have the potential to predict survival for advanced GC patients treated with nivolumab, with the prognostic accuracy of sPD-L1 being improved by its combination with GPS.

PURPOSE: Pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity in programmed death ligand 1 positive (combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1) gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer in KEYNOTE-059 (third line or beyond), KEYNOTE-061 (second line), and KEYNOTE-062 (first line). We characterized efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy in Japanese patients across several lines of therapy in these studies. METHODS: This analysis was conducted in 34 patients from KEYNOTE-059 cohort 1 (all pembrolizumab), including 13 patients with CPS ≥ 1, 65 patients with CPS ≥ 1 from KEYNOTE-061 (pembrolizumab, n = 27; chemotherapy, n = 38), and 70 patients with CPS ≥ 1 from KEYNOTE-062 (pembrolizumab, n = 38; chemotherapy, n = 32). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: In KEYNOTE-059, ORR with pembrolizumab was 9%, median PFS was 2 months, and median OS was 10 months. In KEYNOTE-061, median OS was 12 months with pembrolizumab versus 10 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR), 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-1.15). Median PFS (pembrolizumab vs. chemotherapy) was 2 months versus 4 months (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.69-2.13); ORR was 7% versus 18%. In KEYNOTE-062, median OS was 20 months with pembrolizumab versus 18 months with chemotherapy (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.43-1.33). Median PFS (pembrolizumab vs. chemotherapy) was 6 months versus 7 months (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.61-1.74); ORR was 29% versus 34%. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis provides valuable information that anti-PD-1 therapies are worthy of further assessment for gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02335411 (KEYNOTE-059), NCT02370498 (KEYNOTE-061), and NCT02494583 (KEYNOTE-062).

To assess the potential clinical utility of cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based biomarkers for identifying gastric cancer (GC) patients who benefit from nivolumab. From 31 GC patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy (240 mg/body, Bi-weekly) in 3rd or later line setting, we prospectively collected blood samples at baseline and before the 3rd dose. We compared cfDNA-based molecular findings, including microsatellite instability (MSI) status, to tissue-based biomarkers. We assessed the clinical value of blood tumor mutation burden (bTMB) and copy number alterations (CNA) as well as the cfDNA dynamics. The concordance between deficient-MMR and cfDNA-based MSI-high was 100% (3/3). Patients with bTMB ≥ 6 mut/Mb had significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); however, such significance disappeared when excluding MSI-High cases. The combination of bTMB and CNA positivity identified patients with survival benefit regardless of MSI status (both PFS and OS, P < 0.001), with the best survival in those with bTMB≥6mut/Mb and CNAnegative. Moreover, patients with decreased bTMB during treatment had a better disease control rate (P = 0.04) and longer PFS (P = 0.04). Our results suggest that a combination of bTMB and CNA may predict nivolumab efficacy for GC patients regardless of MSI status. bTMB dynamics have a potential utility as an on-treatment biomarker.

Abstract Background This open-label, multicentre, phase II/III trial assessed the noninferiority of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab vs. fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (control) as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive FTD/TPI (35 mg/m² twice daily, days 1–5 and days 8–12, 28-day cycle) plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, days 1 and 15) or control. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The noninferiority margin of the hazard ratio (HR) was set to 1.33. Results Overall, 397 patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Median OS was 14.8 vs. 18.1 months (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control; HR 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99–1.93; P_{noninferiority} = 0.5920). In patients with a baseline sum of the diameter of target lesions of &lt;60 mm (n = 216, post hoc analyses), the adjusted median OS was similar between groups (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control, 21.4 vs. 20.7 months; HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.55–1.55). Grade ≥3 adverse events (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control) included neutropenia (65.8% vs. 41.6%) and diarrhoea (1.5% vs. 7.1%). Conclusions FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab did not demonstrate noninferiority to fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab as second-line treatment for mCRC. Clinical trial registration JapicCTI-173618, jRCTs031180122.

PURPOSE: Genomic profiling programs have been implemented to apply next-generation sequencing (NGS) for facilitating trial enrollment. SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN is a large-scale genomic profiling program in advanced gastrointestinal cancers using a validated genomic assay with the goal of facilitating enrollment in targeted clinical trials, generating real-world data, and performing clinicogenomic analysis for biomarker discovery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Genotyping of tumor tissue samples from 5,743 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers enrolled in GI-SCREEN was centrally performed with NGS. Patients were enrolled in matched trials of targeted agents affiliated with GI-SCREEN on the basis of genotyping results. RESULTS: A total of 11 gastrointestinal cancers were included, with colorectal cancer being the most common. The median age ranged from 59 to 70.5 years across cancer types. Patients enrolled after initiation of first-line treatment had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than that before treatment initiation with a median survival time difference of 8.9 months and a hazard ratio (HR) ranging from 0.25 to 0.73 across cancer types, demonstrating an immortal time bias. One hundred and forty-nine patients received matched therapies in clinical trials on the basis of their identified alterations. Among patients with colorectal cancer harboring actionable alterations, the median OS was significantly longer in patients who received matched therapies in trials than in those who did not (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.01; P = .049). Cancer-specific pathway alterations were significantly associated with shorter survival and related to primary resistance to matched trial therapies. CONCLUSION: Our genomic profiling program led to patient enrollment in targeted clinical trials and improved survival of patients with colorectal cancer who received matched therapies in clinical trials. To avoid immortal time bias, precautions are needed when using data from patients who have undergone NGS testing after initiation of the evaluated treatment line.

PURPOSE: To investigate efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-low (cohort 1, immunohistochemistry 2+/in situ hybridization-negative; cohort 2, immunohistochemistry 1+) gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with at least two prior regimens, including fluoropyrimidine and platinum, but anti-HER2 therapy naive, received T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate by independent central review. RESULTS: Among 21 patients enrolled in cohort 1 and 24 enrolled in cohort 2, 19 and 21 patients, respectively, had central HER2 confirmation, received T-DXd, and had measurable tumors at baseline. The confirmed objective response rate was 26.3% (95% CI, 9.1 to 51.2) from five partial responses in cohort 1 and 9.5% (95% CI, 1.2 to 30.4) from two partial responses in cohort 2. Thirteen patients (68.4%) in cohort 1 and 12 (60.0%) in cohort 2 experienced reduced tumor size. The median overall survival was 7.8 months (95% CI, 4.7 to nonevaluable) in cohort 1 and 8.5 months (95% CI, 4.3 to 10.9) in cohort 2; the median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.7 to 7.1) and 2.8 months (95% CI, 1.5 to 4.3), respectively. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in cohorts 1 and 2 were anemia (30.0% and 29.2%), decreased neutrophil count (25.0% and 29.2%), and decreased appetite (20.0% and 20.8%). Drug-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis occurred in one patient in each cohort (grade 1 or 2). No drug-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence that T-DXd has clinical activity in patients with heavily pretreated HER2-low gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical relevance of soluble forms of programmed cell death-1 (sPD-1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (sPD-L1) remains unclear. We here investigated the relation between the efficacy of PD-1 blockade and pretreatment plasma levels of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 across a broad range of cancer types. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 171 patients with advanced solid tumors who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy regardless of treatment line. The concentrations of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 were measured with a fully automated immunoassay (HISCL system). RESULTS: The study subjects comprised patients with head and neck cancer (n = 50), urothelial cancer (n = 42), renal cell cancer (n = 37), gastric cancer (n = 20), esophageal cancer (n = 10), malignant pleural mesothelioma (n = 6), or microsatellite instability-high tumors (n = 6). High or low levels of sPD-1 or sPD-L1 were not significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) for PD-1 blockade in the entire study population. Comparison of treatment outcomes according to combinations of high or low sPD-1 and sPD-L1 levels, however, revealed that patients with low sPD-1 and high sPD-L1 concentrations had a significantly poorer PFS (HR of 1.79 [95% CI, 1.13-2.83], p = 0.01) and a tendency toward poorer OS (HR of 1.70 [95% CI, 0.99-2.91], p = 0.05) compared with all other patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the combination of low sPD-1 and high sPD-L1 levels is a potential negative biomarker for PD-1 blockade therapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-FU (NAC-DCF) and adjuvant nivolumab monotherapy are the standard care for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, no effective biomarkers have been found in perioperative setting. We investigated how programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) changes before and after NAC-DCF and how it relates to the therapeutic effect of NAC-DCF in resectable ESCC. METHODS: PD-L1 expression in paired diagnostic biopsy and surgically resected tissues from ESCC patients who underwent surgical resection after receiving two or three NAC-DCF cycles was evaluated. PD-L1 positivity was defined as a combined positive score (CPS) of 10% ≤ . Gene expression analysis was conducted using samples before NAC-DCF. RESULTS: Sixty-six paired samples from 33 patients were included in PD-L1 expression analysis, and 33 Pre-NAC samples acquired by diagnostic biopsy were included in gene expression analysis. Pretreatment, 3 (9%), 13 (39%), and 17 (52%) patients harbored tumors with CPS ranges of < 1%, 1%-10%, and 10% ≤ , respectively. After NAC-DCF, 5 (15%), 15 (45%), and 13 (39%) tumors presented CPS ranges of < 1%, 1%-10%, and 10% ≤ , respectively. The concordance rate between Pre-and Post-NAC-DCF samples was 45%. Patients with PD-L1-negative tumors both before and after NAC-DCF (n = 9) had shorter survival and different gene expression profile characterized by upregulation in WNT signaling or neutrophils. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial PD-L1 expression alteration was observed, resulting in low concordance rate before and after NAC-DCF. Tumors persistently lacking PD-L1 had distinct gene expression profile with worse clinical outcomes, raising the need for further investigation.

The BRAF V600E mutation accounts for approximately 5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and is an extremely poor prognostic factor. However, there are no clear recommendations regarding first-line therapy for patients with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, during or after adjuvant chemotherapy. Recently, a novel combination of encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab, showed a higher response rate than standard chemotherapy in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC. Here we describe our plan for the TRESBIEN study (OGSG 2101), which is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II study designed to evaluate whether encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab are effective for patients with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer, during or after adjuvant chemotherapy. The planned number of subjects is 25.

With the enforcement of the revised Pharmaceutical Affairs Law in 2003, physicians and dentists are now able to plan and conduct the"investigator-initiated"trial, whereas previously only companies were allowed to conduct such clinical trials. Although the number of investigator-initiated trials is increasing year by year, the high cost of conducting such trials and the difficulty of obtaining funds to cover the high cost are obstacles to their realization. In addition, the purpose of investigator- initiated clinical trials is to obtain approval for a drug or treatment, but in reality, there are many investigator -initiated clinical trials that do not aim for approval, and in some cases, the only difference between investigator-initiated clinical trials and specific clinical research is the approval status of the drug to be used in trials. In this article, the author will outline the current status and problems of investigator-initiated clinical trials in Japan in the midst of globalization of drug development, including the author's personal views.

Abstract Background Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-based treatments are approved for several cancers. CheckMate 648, a global, phase 3 trial, showed that first-line nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) or nivolumab plus chemotherapy (NIVO + Chemo) significantly increased survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) without new safety signals versus chemotherapy alone (Chemo). Methods We evaluated the Japanese subpopulation of CheckMate 648 (n = 394/970), randomized to receive first-line NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, or Chemo. Efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in Japanese patients with tumor-cell programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% and in all randomized Japanese patients. Results In the Japanese population, 131, 126, and 137 patients were treated with NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, and Chemo, and 66, 62, and 65 patients had tumor-cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%, respectively. In patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%, median OS was numerically longer with NIVO + IPI (20.2 months; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.46 [0.30–0.71]) and NIVO + Chemo (17.3 months; 0.53 [0.35–0.82]) versus Chemo (9.0 months). In all randomized patients, median OS was numerically longer with NIVO + IPI (17.6 months; 0.68 [0.51–0.92]) and NIVO + Chemo (15.5 months; 0.73 [0.54–0.99]) versus Chemo (11.0 months). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 37%, 49%, and 36% of all patients in the NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, and Chemo arms, respectively. Conclusion Survival benefits with acceptable tolerability observed for NIVO + IPI and NIVO + Chemo treatments strongly support their use as a new standard first-line treatment in Japanese patients with advanced ESCC. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03143153.

It has been suggested that the therapeutic efficacy of S-1 + cisplatin (SP) and capecitabine + cisplatin (XP) may differ depending on the histology of the tumor, but no clear evidence exists. Individual participant data were obtained from three randomized phase II trials in which such patients received either SP (S-1 [40-60 mg twice daily for 21 days] plus cisplatin [60 mg/m2 on day 8], every 5 weeks) or XP (capecitabine [1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days] plus cisplatin [80 mg/m2 on day 1], every 3 weeks). A total of 162 patients were included, with 79 patients in the SP arm and 83 patients in the XP arm. Although there was also no difference between arms in ORR according to histological classification, differentiated tumors showed a significantly better OS (but not PFS) for SP versus XP that was associated with a deeper tumor shrinkage. Undifferentiated tumors showed a consistently better OS, and PFS for SP versus XP, likely because cases without tumor shrinkage tended to be fewer for SP. Our data thus showed that SP was superior to XP in this setting, but there were qualitative differences in therapeutic efficacy dependent on tumor histology.

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of orally-administered bendamustine in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. The optimal dosing schedule, safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor effects were also evaluated. A multicenter, open-label trial with a standard 3 + 3 design and dose escalation by dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was conducted. The treatment schedules were once daily for 7, 14, and 21 days every 3 weeks as one cycle. The total dose per cycle was increased from 175 to 840 mg/m2. Eighteen patients were enrolled in this study. DLT occurred in one of six patients at 75 mg/m2/day × 7 days, and one of three patients at 37.5 mg/m2/day × 14 days and 25 mg/m2/day × 21 days. However, the delayed recovery from a decrease in neutrophil or platelet count hampered the start of subsequent treatment cycles, and the trend was more prominent at 37.5 mg/m2/day × 14 days and 25 mg/m2/day × 21 days than in 75 mg/m2/day × 7 days. MTD was determined as 75 mg/m2/day × 7 days to allow acceptable hematologic recovery. The pharmacokinetics of orally-administered bendamustine were generally dose-dependent; however, the inter-individual variability is relatively large. The major adverse events were hematologic toxicities; gastrointestinal disorders were generally mild. Adverse drug reactions did not lead to the discontinuation of the drug. A partial response was observed in two of six patients (prostatic small cell carcinoma and thymic carcinoma) at 75 mg/m2/day × 7 days. The RD and optimal dosing schedule of orally-administered bendamustine was 75 mg/m2 once daily for 7 days every 3 weeks for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. (Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03604679. Registration date July 27, 2018).

OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a key therapeutic modality for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but most patients experience primary or acquired resistance to these drugs. We here explored the mechanisms underlying both types of ICI resistance by analysis of the tumor immune microenvironment (TME). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients who experienced a long-term response to ICI treatment (progression-free survival [PFS] of ≥12 months) followed by disease progression, after which a rebiopsy was immediately performed (cohort-A), as well as four patients who experienced early tumor progression during ICI treatment (PFS of <9 weeks, cohort-B) were enrolled in this retrospective study. The pretreatment TME was evaluated by 16- or 17-color multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC)-based spatial profiling at the single-cell level for both cohorts. In cohort-A, changes in the TME after disease progression during ICI treatment were also investigated by mIHC analysis and transcriptomic analysis. RESULTS: Pretreatment tumor tissue from cohort-B manifested poor infiltration of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells characterized by CD39 and CD103 expression or by programmed cell death-1 expression, implicating insufficient recognition of tumor cells by CD8+ T cells as a mechanism of primary ICI resistance. Analysis of the paired tumor specimens from cohort-A revealed various changes in the TME associated with acquired ICI resistance, including substantial infiltration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and M2-type tumor-associated macrophages without a marked decline in the number of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells; a decrease in the number of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells; and an apparent decrease in neoantigen presentation by tumor cells. CONCLUSION: The presence of intratumoral tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells may be a prerequisite for a long-term response to ICI treatment in advanced NSCLC, but it is not sufficient for cancer cell eradication. Various TME profiles are associated with acquired ICI resistance, suggesting that patient-specific strategies to overcome such resistance may be necessary.

BACKGROUND: Fluorouracil (FU), platinum (PT), and taxane (TAX) therapy was the standard chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) before the era of anti-programmed death-1 antibodies. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) ESCC resistant or intolerable to FU, PT, and TAX therapy. METHODS: Eligible patients had R/M ESCC; no prior S-1 use; were intolerant or refractory to prior FU, PT, and TAX therapy; aged ≧ 20 years; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1. S-1 was administered orally from days 1 to 28, every 6 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR) for each patient, assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, response rate, and toxicity. RESULTS: Between October 2015 and December 2017, 17 patients were recruited, and the trial was terminated because of slow accrual. The DCR was 46.7%. The response rate was 13.3%. The median progression-free survival was 2.0 months. The median time to treatment failure was 1.9 months. The median overall survival was 8.4 months, and the 1 year overall survival rate was 30.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Although this trial closed early because of slow accrual, we observed modest clinical activity with S-1 in patients with R/M ESCC who could not tolerate or whose tumors were refractory to FU, PT, and TAX therapy.

The KEYNOTE-659 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line pembrolizumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) (cohort 1) or S-1 and cisplatin (SP) (cohort 2) for advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer in Japan. Herein, we update the results of cohort 1 and describe the results of cohort 2. This open-label phase IIb study enrolled patients with advanced programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive (combined positive score ≥ 1) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The primary end-point was the objective response rate (ORR). Other end-points were duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. One hundred patients were enrolled. In cohorts 1 and 2, median follow-up time was 16.9 and 17.1 months; ORR (central review), 72.2% and 80.4%; DOR, 10.6 and 9.5 months; DCR (central review), 96.3% and 97.8%; median PFS (central review), 9.4 and 8.3 months; and median OS, 16.9 and 17.1 months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all patients, including peripheral sensory neuropathy (94.4%, cohort 1), decreased neutrophil count (82.6%, cohort 2), nausea (59.3% and 60.9% in cohorts 1 and 2), and decreased appetite (61.1% and 60.9% in cohorts 1 and 2). Grade 3 or higher TRAEs were reported by 59.3% (cohort 1) and 78.3% (cohort 2), including decreased platelet count (14.8%, cohort 1) and decreased neutrophil count (52.2%, cohort 2). Pembrolizumab in combination with SOX or SP showed favorable efficacy and safety in patients with PD-L1-positive, HER2-negative G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Large type 3 and type 4 gastric cancers have extremely poor prognoses. To address this, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be a promising approach. The phase III JCOG0501 study, conducted to confirm the superiority of neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin followed by D2 gastrectomy over upfront surgery, showed no survival benefit for neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin. In Korea, the PRODIGY study, which was a phase III study of neoadjuvant docetaxel plus oxaliplatin plus S-1 (DOS) followed by surgery and adjuvant S-1 versus surgery and adjuvant S-1 for gastric cancer of T2-3N+ or T4Nany, showed that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly superior in the neoadjuvant DOS arm. Therefore, DOS therapy may be a promising candidate for preoperative chemotherapy for large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer. METHODS: Preoperative docetaxel 40 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 will be intravenously administered on day1 every three weeks. S-1 will be orally administered 80 mg/m2 on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle. Patients will receive three courses of treatment and gastrectomy with ≥D2 lymph node dissection. Postoperative S-1 plus docetaxel therapy (DS) will be administered according to the JACCRO GC-07 (START-2) study. The primary endpoint is the 3-year PFS rate. Secondary endpoints include PFS time, overall survival time, pathological response rate, response rate according to RECIST version1.1, proportion of completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, R0 resection rate, proportion of completion of surgery, proportion of completion of protocol treatment, proportion of negative conversion of CY, adverse event occurrence rate, and nutritional evaluation. The null hypothesis for the 3-year PFS rate is 45% and the expected value is 60%. The total sample size is 46 considering that the registration period and follow-up period are two and three years, respectively. DISCUSSION: This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial assessing the efficacy and safety of preoperative DOS and postoperative DS for large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer. The results will inform future phase III trials and are expected to lead to new treatment strategies for large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on October 11, 2019 ( jRCTs051190060 ).

BACKGROUND: Although docetaxel plus S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy after gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy has been a standard of treatment for stage III gastric cancer, there is no established chemotherapy for patients with recurrence during or within six months after the completion of adjuvant docetaxel plus S-1 therapy. METHODS: The OGSG 1901 trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial evaluating ramucirumab plus irinotecan for gastric cancer patients with early relapse after adjuvant docetaxel plus S-1 therapy. The key eligibility criteria were: 1) histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma 2) patients who were on docetaxel plus S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy after the confirmation of pathological stage III, 3) patients with early relapse, i.e., recurrence during or within 6 months after the completion of docetaxel plus S-1 therapy, and 4) patient with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Irinotecan (150 mg/m2, day 1) and ramucirumab (8 mg/kg, day 1) will be administered every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and the secondary endpoints are overall response rate, progression-free survival, and safety. The number of patients has been set at 40 based on the threshold and expected median survival times of 7 and 11 months, respectively, with a one-sided alpha error of 0.05 and power of 0.80. The enrollment and follow-up periods are 2 and 1.5 years, respectively. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will indicate whether the ramucirumab with irinotecan regimen has the potential to be a recommended treatment regimen for patients with recurrence gastric cancer during or within 6 months after the completion of adjuvant docetaxel plus S-1 therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ( jRCTs05119071 , October 6, 2019).

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the good feasibility and favorable efficacy of perioperative capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOx) in patients (pts) with clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1-3 M0 gastric cancer (GC) in a phase II study in which the pathological response rate, the primary endpoint, of 54.1% was demonstrated. Here, we report 3-year follow-up data. METHODS: The eligibility criteria included clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1-3 M0 GC according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma-3rd English Edition (JCGC). Three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx (capecitabine, 2000mg/m2 for 14 days; oxaliplatin, 130mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) were administered, followed by 5 cycles of adjuvant CapeOx after D2 gastrectomy. Three-year overall survival and relapse-free survival are presented here, and analyzed by cohorts based on pathologic response rate (pRR). RESULTS: Thirty-seven pts were enrolled from July 2016 to May 2017, and fully evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. Thirty-three pts (89.2%) completed the planned three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx and underwent gastrectomy, with an R0 resection rate of 78.4% (n = 29). The overall survival (OS) rate and relapse-free survival (RFS) rate at 3 years was 83.8% (95% CI, 72.7-96.5%) and 73.0% (95% CI, 60.0-88.8%), respectively. Further, the 3-year OS rate in pts with pathological response of grade 1a (n = 13) and grade 1b or higher (n = 20) was 69.2% (95% CI: 48.2-99.5%) and 100.0%, respectively, based on JCGC. Pathological response rate was classified according to JCGC as follows: grade 0, the tumor was not affected; grade 1a, less than one-third of the tumor was affected; grade 1b, one to two thirds of the tumor was affected; grade 2, greater than or equal to two thirds was affected; and grade 3, no residual tumor. A pathological response was defined as grade 1b or greater. CONCLUSION: Perioperative CapeOx showed good feasibility and favorable prognosis, especially in pts with pathological response of grade 1b or higher and was found to be useful in predicting prognosis. The data obtained using this novel approach warrant further investigation (Trial ID: UMIN000021641, jRCTs051180109).

Introduction: Previous prospective studies suggest that the sequential use of cytotoxic agents, such as oxaliplatin, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has the potential to improve prognosis and maintain quality of life than combination chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a sequential treatment strategy consisting of an initial therapy (capecitabine, S-1, or 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin [LV/5-FU] plus bevacizumab) and subsequent therapy (i.e., initial therapy plus oxaliplatin) for mCRC. Methods: The primary endpoint was second progression-free survival (2nd PFS) between the start of initial therapy and tumor progression after sequential therapy; secondary endpoints were PFS after initial treatment, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Results: Sixty-six patients were planned to be recruited. However, owing to a slow accrual rate, recruitment was terminated when only 19 patients were enrolled between 2011 and 2015; 4, 10, and 5 patients were administered capecitabine plus bevacizumab, S-1 plus bevacizumab, and LV/5-FU plus bevacizumab, respectively. The proportions of those with a KRAS status (wild-type/mutant/unknown) were 26%, 21%, and 53%, respectively. The median 2nd PFS and OS were 19.1 months and not reached, respectively. The ORR was 45.5% in the initial therapy and 16.7% in the subsequent therapy. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (5%), proteinuria (5%), and hypertension (47%). Conclusion: Although our data are limited and preliminary, the sequential treatment strategy may provide a survival benefit in patients with mCRC. Further investigation of this treatment approach is warranted.

PURPOSE: EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is a standard first-line therapy for activated EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Treatment options for patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance are limited. HER3 mediates EGFR-TKI resistance. Clinical trials of the HER3-targeting antibody-drug conjugate patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) demonstrated its anticancer activity in EGFR-mutated NSCLC; however, the mechanisms that regulate HER3 expression are unknown. This study was conducted with the aim to clarify the mechanisms underlying HER3 regulation in EGFR-mutated NSCLC tumors and explored the strategy for enhancing the anticancer activity of HER3-DXd in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Paired tumor samples were obtained from 48 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKI(s). HER3 expression was immunohistochemically quantified with H-score, and genomic alteration and transcriptomic signature were tested in tumors from pretreatment to post-EGFR-TKI resistance acquisition. The anticancer efficacy of HER3-DXd and osimertinib was evaluated in EGFR-mutated NSCLC cells. RESULTS: We showed augmented HER3 expression in EGFR-mutated tumors with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance compared with paired pretreatment samples. RNA sequencing revealed that repressed PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling was associated with HER3 augmentation, especially in tumors from patients who received continuous EGFR-TKI therapy. An in vitro study also showed that EGFR-TKI increased HER3 expression, repressed AKT phosphorylation in multiple EGFR-mutated cancers, and enhanced the anticancer activity of HER3-DXd. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings help clarify the mechanisms of HER3 regulation in EGFR-mutated NSCLC tumors and highlight a rationale for combination therapy with HER3-DXd and EGFR-TKI in EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Matrix metalloproteinase 14 (MMP14) expression is implicated in progression of colorectal cancer, but its role in the tumor microenvironment (TME) has been unclear. The relevance of MMP14 to colorectal cancer progression was explored by analysis of transcriptomic data for colorectal adenocarcinoma patients (n = 592) in The Cancer Genome Atlas. The role of MMP14 in the TME was investigated in a retrospective analysis of tumor samples from 86 individuals with stage III colorectal cancer by single cell-based spatial profiling of MMP14 expression as performed by 12-color multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC). Analysis of gene expression data revealed that high MMP14 expression was associated with tumor progression and implicated both cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and tumor-associated macrophages in such progression. Spatial profiling by mIHC revealed that a higher percentage of MMP14+ cells among intratumoral CAFs (MMP14+ CAF/CAF ratio) was associated with poorer relapse-free survival. Multivariable analysis including key clinical factors identified the MMP14+ CAF/CAF ratio as an independent poor prognostic factor. Moreover, the patient subset with both a high MMP14+ CAF/CAF ratio and a low tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density showed the worst prognosis. Our results suggest that MMP14+ CAFs play an important role in progression of stage III colorectal cancer and may therefore be a promising therapeutic target.

BACKGROUND: Safe and effective treatments for advanced esophageal cancer are an unmet need in Japan. We report results of a subgroup analysis of Japanese patients enrolled in KEYNOTE-181, a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer whose disease progressed after standard first-line therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks or investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan. Efficacy was evaluated in all Japanese patients and in those with programmed death ligand 1 combined positive score ≥ 10. RESULTS: Of the 152 Japanese patients enrolled (pembrolizumab, n = 77; chemotherapy, n = 75), 150 (98.7%) had squamous cell carcinoma and 79 (52.0%) had combined positive score ≥ 10. At the final analysis, median overall survival was improved among all patients (12.4 vs 8.2 months with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI 0.48-0.97) and patients with combined positive score ≥ 10 (12.6 vs 8.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI 0.42-1.10). Fewer patients had any-grade (74.0% vs 95.9%) or grade 3-5 (16.9 vs 50.0%) treatment-related adverse events with pembrolizumab than with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Consistent with the global trial results, second-line pembrolizumab therapy showed a survival benefit and a favorable safety profile compared with chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib(Rego)is the salvage line standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC), which often causes severe toxicities, such as hand-foot syndrome. Previously, we reported that in phase Ⅱ study, S-1 plus bevacizumab( Bev)(SB)showed favorable anticancer activity and feasibility as a salvage line. The aim of this study was to evaluate 2 treatments for mCRC as salvage line. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter phase Ⅱ study, the patients were randomly assigned(1:1)to the Rego or SB group. In the Rego group, Rego 160 mg/kg body weight was orally administered every 28 days for 21 days. In the SB group, S-1 was orally administered every 42 days for 28 days, according to body surface area, and Bev 5 mg/kg was administered by intravenous infusion on days 1, 15, and 29. Administration of S-1 every 21 days for 14 days and Bev 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 was also permitted. The primary endpoint was overall survival(OS), and the planned sample size was 86. RESULTS: This study was ended prematurely due to poor accrual. Overall, 8 patients were enrolled from 6 institutions between Oct 2013 and May 2015. Although 4 patients were assigned to each group, one patient in the Rego group was excluded after enrollment. The median OS in the Rego and SB groups was 30.2 months and 6.6 months, respectively(hazard ratio: 0.205, p=0.123). The median progression-free survival in the Rego and SB groups was 3.7 months and 1.6 months, respectively. The disease control rate in the Rego and SB groups was 100% and 75%, respectively. The Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were increased, including AST/ALT(n=1, 25%), hyponatremia(n=1, 25%), hand-foot syndrome(n=1, 25%), hypertension(n=1, 25%), and proteinuria(n=1, 25%)in the Rego group and colitis( n=1, 25%)in the SB group; the treatment was discontinued. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that data could only be collected from a small number of patients, SB is not recommended as salvage line for mCRC.

BACKGROUND: To compare irinotecan-alone, paclitaxel-alone, and each combination chemotherapy with S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) that is refractory to S-1 or S-1 plus cisplatin (SP). METHODS: Patients with AGC after first-line chemotherapy with S-1 or SP, or patients during adjuvant chemotherapy or within 26 weeks after adjuvant chemotherapy completion with S-1 with confirmed disease progression were eligible. Patients were randomly divided into four groups based on treatment: irinotecan-alone (irinotecan; 150 mg/m2, day 1, q14 days), paclitaxel-alone (paclitaxel; 80 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15, q28 days), S-1 plus irinotecan (irinotecan; 80 mg/m2, days 1, 15, S-1; 80 mg/m2, days 1-21, q35 days), and S-1 plus paclitaxel (paclitaxel; 50 mg/m2, day1, 8, S-1; 80 mg/m2, days 1-14, q21 days). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and safety. RESULTS: From July 2008 to March 2012, 127 patients were enrolled. No difference in median OS was observed in the irinotecan vs. paclitaxel groups or in the monotherapy groups vs. the S-1 combination therapy groups. Median PFS was longer in the paclitaxel group compared with the irinotecan group (4.1 vs. 3.6 months, p = 0.035), although no difference was observed when comparing monotherapy vs. S-1 combination. The most common grade 3 to 4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia with no difference in incidence rate across the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in OS between irinotecan and paclitaxel no in OS prolongation of S-1 combination therapy in second-line chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: There is no large real-world data regarding efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in gastric cancer (GC). Although some tumors can grow rapidly after immunotherapy, the patient proportions and survival outcomes are unclear in GC. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective observational study was performed to evaluate clinical outcomes including survival time, safety, and tumor behavior of nivolumab treatment for patients with advanced GC. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints included response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor growth rate (TGR) at first evaluation, and safety. RESULTS: Of 501 enrolled patients, 487 were evaluable (median age 70 years, 71% male, performance status 0/1/2 [42%/44%/14%], 21% HER2-pos, 42% patients with ascites). Median OS was 5.82 months (95% CI 5.29-7.00) with a 1-year survival rate of 30% and median PFS of 1.84 months (95% CI 1.71-1.97). The DCR was 39.4% and the RR was 14.2% (95% CI 10.3-18.8) in 282 patients with measurable lesions. In 219 patients evaluable for TGR, 20.5% were identified as hyperprogressive disease (HPD). OS from the first evaluation of patients with HPD was shorter compared with non-HPD (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.25-2.51, P = 0.001), but it was not worse than that of patients with progression and non-HPD (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.72-1.53, P = 0.8). A multivariate analysis revealed the presence of peritoneal metastasis was a prognostic factor for OS and PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world data demonstrated the comparable survival time to a previous clinical trial and revealed the frequency and prognosis of patients with HPD in advanced GC treated with nivolumab.

PURPOSE: Treatment with KRAS G12C inhibitors such as sotorasib can produce substantial regression of tumors in some patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These patients require alternative treatment after acquiring resistance to the inhibitor. The mechanisms underlying this acquired resistance are unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify the mechanisms underlying acquired sotorasib resistance, and to explore potential treatments for rescuing patients with sotorasib-resistant KRAS G12C NSCLC cells. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Clones of sotorasib-sensitive KRAS G12C NSCLC H23 cells exposed to different concentrations of sotorasib were examined using whole-genomic transcriptome analysis, multiple receptor kinase phosphorylation analysis, and gene copy number evaluation. The underlying mechanisms of resistance were investigated using immunological examination, and a treatment aimed at overcoming resistance was tested in vitro and in vivo Results: Unbiased screening detected subclonal evolution of MET amplification in KRAS G12C NSCLC cells that had developed resistance to sotorasib in vitro MET knockdown using siRNA restored susceptibility to sotorasib in these resistant cells. MET activation by its amplification reinforced RAS cycling from its inactive form to its active form. In addition to RAS-mediated MEK-ERK induction, MET induced AKT activation independently of RAS. Crizotinib, a MET inhibitor, restored sensitivity to sotorasib by eliminating RAS-MEK-ERK as well as AKT signaling. MET/KRAS G12C dual inhibition led to tumor shrinkage in sotorasib-resistant xenograft mice. CONCLUSIONS: MET amplification leads to the development of resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors in NSCLC. Dual blockade of MET and KRAS G12C could be a treatment option for MET amplified, KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used to treat various malignancies. Although the gut microbiome is known to influence the efficacy of ICIs on epithelial tumors, the functional interactions between gut taxa and colonic mucosa remain poorly understood. Here we performed transcriptomic profiling and 16S rRNA sequencing to investigate the relationships between mucosal gene expression and microbial composition with ICI responses and gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events (GI irAEs). In responders, genes related to DNA repair and cell cycle signatures were enriched in responders whereas signatures related to innate immune response, NFAT and IFN-γ signaling pathways were enriched in nonresponders. Gut microbial composition revealed an association between moderate GI irAE and favorable response to ICI therapy. Favorable therapeutic responses to ICI and GI irAE treatments were associated with taxa classified as Enterobacteriaceae and were related to ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis, cytokine-mediated signaling pathway, tRNA metabolic process, and ribonucleoprotein complex assembly in the colon. These findings open new perspectives for improving the efficacy and safety of cancer immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) treated with definitive radiotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 101 patients with OPC who underwent definitive radiotherapy between 2008 and 2018. RESULTS: The median follow-up period of the surviving patients was 68 months (range, 8-164 months). The 5-year overall survival rate was 69.8%. Univariate analyses revealed that poor survival was associated with male sex, smoking ≥30 pack-years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥1, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage III-IV (8th edition), HPV-negativity, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥202, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio ≥0.15, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio <2.90. In multivariate analyses, poor survival was independently correlated with smoking ≥30 pack-years (p < 0.01) and LDH ≥202 (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggested that high LDH levels predicted poor survival after definitive radiotherapy for patients with both HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPC.

Precision medicine, which considers the genetics of the tumor tissues and cells for selection of the most appropriate treatment strategy, has recently been developed for colorectal cancer. The BRAF mutation status in colorectal cancer has been tested, but precision medicine for BRAF-mutated tumors had not been applicable due to no approved BRAF-targeting drugs until recently. In addition, conventional standard chemotherapy for BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer show limited effectiveness, resulting in poor prognosis. Therefore, we need new drugs specific for BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer. In this review, we outline the characteristics, development, and new treatment strategies for BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer. In addition, we introduce the BEACON CRC study, which prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of encorafenib(BRAF inhibitor), binimetinib(MEK inhibitor), and cetuximab(anti-EGFR antibody)in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with the BRAF V600E-mutation.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of personalized medicine requires the accessibility of tumor molecular profiling in order to allow prioritization of appropriate targeted therapies for individual patients. Our aim was to study the role of comprehensive genomic profiling assays that may inform treatment recommendations for patients with solid tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study to evaluate the feasibility of application of the FoundationOne CDx panel-which detects substitutions, insertions and deletions, and copy number alterations in 324 genes, select gene rearrangements, and genomic signatures including microsatellite instability and tumor mutation burden (TMB)-to patients with advanced or recurrent solid tumors before its approval in Japan. RESULTS: A total of 181 samples were processed for genomic testing between September 2018 and June 2019, with data being successfully obtained for 175 of these samples, yielding a success rate of 96.7%. The median turnaround time was 41 days (range, 21-126 days). The most common known or likely pathogenic variants were TP53 mutations (n = 113), PIK3CA mutations (n = 33), APC mutations (n = 32), and KRAS mutations (n = 29). Among the 153 patients assessed for TMB, the median TMB was 4 mutations/Mb, and tumors with a high TMB (≥10 mutations/Mb) were more prevalent for lung cancer (11/32) than for other solid tumor types (9/121, Fisher's exact test p < .01). No clear trend toward increased efficacy for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy or ICI combination chemotherapy in patients with a high programmed cell death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score or a high TMB was apparent. Among the 174 patients found to harbor known or likely pathogenic actionable alterations, 24 individuals (14%) received matched targeted therapy. CONCLUSION: The FoundationOne CDx assay was performed with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens with a success rate of >95%. Such testing may inform the matching of patients with cancer with investigational or approved targeted drugs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This prospective cohort study was initiated to investigate the feasibility and utility of clinical application of FoundationOne CDx. A total of 181 samples were processed for genomic testing between September 2018 and June 2019, with data being successfully obtained for 175 of these samples, yielding a success rate of 96.7%, and 24 individuals (14%) received matched targeted therapy.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin plus S-1 (CS) is the standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in Japan. A previous phase III trial showed that docetaxel plus S-1 (DS) was effective for AGC without measurable lesions, but no studies have compared these two regimens. METHODS: Eligible patients had unresectable or recurrent HER2-negative AGC without measurable lesions. Patients were randomized to DS (docetaxel 40 mg/m2 on day 1, S-1 80-120 mg on days 1-14, every 3 weeks) or CS (cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 8, S-1 80-120 mg on days 1-21, every 5 weeks). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: All patients had unresectable primary disease. Sixty-one patients were randomly assigned to DS (n = 30) or CS (n = 31). One CS patient was ineligible due to HER2 positivity. The median number of cycles was 9.5 (range 2-49) with DS and 5.5 (range 1-10) with CS. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity was fatigue (7% with DS, 13% with CS), followed by anorexia (3% with DS, 10% with CS) and diarrhea (3% with DS, 10% with CS). The 2-year OS rates were 43.3% with DS and 30.0% with CS (log-rank P = 0.113), with a hazard ratio of 0.617 (95% confidence interval 0.337-1.128), indicating non-inferiority of DS to CS with respect to OS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DS showed slightly but nonsignificantly less toxicity and higher efficacy than CS for AGC without measurable lesions. DS should be further investigated in phase III trials.

Nivolumab is an increasingly used standard care treatment for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer, with increasing clinical use in Japan. Data from retrospective studies on various tumors have shown the objective response rate to cytotoxic chemotherapy potentially improves after an exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Based on these data, we conducted the multicenter observational REVIVE study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cytotoxic chemotherapy in nivolumab-refractory or nivolumab-intolerant patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients who are refractory or intolerant to nivolumab and scheduled to receive irinotecan monotherapy, oxaliplatin combination treatment or oral trifluridine/tipiracil hydrochloride therapy will be included. The primary end point is overall survival of nivolumab-pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer after the cytotoxic chemotherapy. Clinical trial registration: UMIN000032182 (umin.ac.jp).

BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumour microenvironment (TME) suppress antitumour immunity, and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib has antifibrotic effects. METHODS: We performed a preclinical study to evaluate whether nintedanib might enhance antitumour immunity by targeting CAFs and thereby improve the response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). RESULTS: Whereas nintedanib did not suppress the growth of B16-F10 melanoma cells in vitro, it prolonged survival in a syngeneic mouse model of tumour formation by these cells, suggestive of an effect on the TME without direct cytotoxicity. Gene expression profiling indeed showed that nintedanib influenced antitumour immunity and fibrosis. Tumoural infiltration of CD8+ T cells and granzyme B production were increased by nintedanib, and its antitumour activity was attenuated by antibody-mediated depletion of these cells, indicating that nintedanib suppressed tumour growth in a CD8+ T cell-dependent manner. Moreover, nintedanib inhibited the proliferation and activation of fibroblasts. Finally, the combination of nintedanib with ICB showed enhanced antitumour efficacy in B16-F10 tumour-bearing mice. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that nintedanib targeted CAFs and thereby attenuated the immunosuppressive nature of the TME and promoted the intratumoural accumulation and activation of CD8+ T cells, with these effects contributing to enhanced antitumour activity in combination with ICB.

LESSONS LEARNED: Panitumumab monotherapy showed favorable efficacy and feasibility in the treatment of frail or elderly patients with RAS wild-type unresectable colorectal cancer. It is especially effective for left-sided tumors; therefore, panitumumab as first-line treatment could be an additional therapeutic option for frail elderly patients, particularly in those who are unsuitable for upfront oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based combination regimens. BACKGROUND: First-line panitumumab monotherapy is expected to be well tolerated and improve survival in patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, its safety and efficacy in chemotherapy-naïve frail or elderly patients with unresectable RAS wild-type (WT) colorectal cancer (CRC) have not been studied. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab as first-line treatment. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter phase II study on patients aged ≥76 years or ≥65 years considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. Panitumumab 6 mg/kg of intravenous infusion was administered every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (median age: 81 [range, 67-88] years) were enrolled between February 2017 and August 2018. Two patients were excluded from the analysis of efficacy: one from lack of image examination at baseline and the other from lack of a measurable lesion. Thirty-three (91.6%) patients had a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1, whereas two (5.6%) patients and one (2.8%) patient had a PS of 2 and 3, respectively. Twenty-eight patients (77.8%) had left-sided CRC, whereas eight (22.2%) had right-sided CRC. The RR was 50.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.4-67.6), including three patients (8.8%) who had complete responses. A total of 26.5% had stable diseases, resulting in a DCR of 76.5% (90% CI, 61.5-87.7). The RR of patients with left- and right-sided tumors was 65.4% (95% CI, 44.3-82.8) and 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0-36.9), respectively. Major grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities were rash (n = 6, 16.7%), hypomagnesemia (n = 4, 11.1%), fatigue (n = 3, 8.3%), paronychia (n = 2, 5.6%), and hyponatremia (n = 2, 5.6%). The only grade 3 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (n = 1, 2.8%). CONCLUSION: Panitumumab monotherapy showed favorable efficacy and feasibility in frail or elderly patients with RAS WT unresectable CRC. Survival analysis including OS, PFS, and TTF is currently in progress.

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) plays a key role in hematopoiesis. However, the oncogenic role of FLT3 amplification in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains unclear. Here, we aimed to evaluate the characteristics, prognosis, and treatment efficacy of an FLT3 inhibitor (regorafenib) in patients with mCRC with FLT3 amplifications. Tumor tissue samples from 2329 patients were sequenced using NGS in the Nationwide Cancer Genome Screening Project in Japan. The effects of clinicopathological features, co-altered genes, prognosis, and efficacy of regorafenib were investigated. Between April 2015 and June 2018, 85 patients with mCRC with FLT3 amplification were observed. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between patients with or without FLT3 amplification. The frequency of RAS or other gene co-alterations was inversely correlated with the copy number status. Median survival time in patients with FLT3 amplification was significantly shorter compared with those with non-FLT3 amplification. Further investigations of FLT3 amplification as a potential treatment target in mCRC are warranted.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus chemotherapy was evaluated in the Japanese subpopulation from the overall intent-to-treat (ITT) population of the ATTRACTION-3 trial conducted in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) as second-line treatment. METHODS: Data from Japanese patients enrolled in the multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 ATTRACTION-3 trial were analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Exploratory subgroup analyses evaluated the association between OS and stratification factors/baseline variables. RESULTS: Overall, 274 (nivolumab, 136; chemotherapy, 138) of the 419 patients in ATTRACTION-3 were enrolled from Japan: response-evaluable population (107; 108) and safety population (135; 138). OS tended to be longer in the nivolumab group versus the chemotherapy group (median: 13.4 months vs. 9.4 months; HR, 0.77; 95% CI 0.59-1.01). Median DOR was longer in the nivolumab group (7.6 months) versus the chemotherapy group (3.6 months). ORRs were similar between the nivolumab [22.4% of patients (24/107)] and chemotherapy groups [22.2% (24/108); odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI 0.52-1.87]. DCR was lower in the nivolumab group [41.1% (44/107)] versus the chemotherapy group [66.7% (72/108)]. OS in the exploratory analysis consistently favored the nivolumab group versus the chemotherapy group. Overall, nivolumab demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety versus chemotherapy in the Japanese subpopulation, and the trend was similar to that observed in the overall ATTRACTION-3 ITT population. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab represents a new standard second-line treatment option for Japanese patients with advanced ESCC.

BACKGROUND: Hepatectomy is standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases; however, it is unclear whether liver metastases from other primary cancers should be resected or not. The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery therefore created clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic liver tumors. METHODS: Eight primary diseases were selected based on the number of hepatectomies performed for each malignancy per year. Clinical questions were structured in the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) format. Systematic reviews were performed, and the strength of recommendations and the level of quality of evidence for each clinical question were discussed and determined. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. RESULTS: The eight primary sites were grouped into five categories based on suggested indications for hepatectomy and consensus of the guidelines committee. Fourteen clinical questions were devised, covering five topics: (1) diagnosis, (2) operative treatment, (3) ablation therapy, (4) the eight primary diseases, and (5) systemic therapies. The grade of recommendation was strong for one clinical question and weak for the other 13 clinical questions. The quality of the evidence was moderate for two questions, low for 10, and very low for two. A flowchart was made to summarize the outcomes of the guidelines for the indications of hepatectomy and systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines were developed to provide useful information based on evidence in the published literature for the clinical management of liver metastases, and they could be helpful for conducting future clinical trials to provide higher-quality evidence.

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) (a.k.a. TAS-102) is a combination drug for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and severely pretreated metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers, comprising FTD, a thymidine-based antineoplastic nucleoside analog, and TPI, which enhances FTD bioavailability. Herein, in KRAS mutant murine colorectal cancer CT26 syngeneic models, we investigate whether combination therapy with DC101 (a surrogate ramucirumab antibody, rat antimouse vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2 monoclonal antibody (mAb)) improves FTD/TPI efficacy. Tumor growth inhibition (TGI) on day 15 was 38.0% and 30.6% upon DC101 monotherapy and FTD/TPI monotherapy respectively, and 60.3% upon combination therapy. Tumor volume was significantly lower (p < 0.001) upon combination treatment than upon FTD/TPI or DC101 monotherapy, indicating the additive effects of FTD/TPI and DC101. DNA-incorporated FTD levels on Day 8 were significantly higher in combination therapy with FTD/TPI (for 5 consecutive days) and DC101 (on alternate days for 7days) than in FTD/TPI monotherapy. Furthermore, vascular endothelial cell-specific marker CD31 was downregulated in DC101-treated tumors on day 8. These results indicate that combination therapy with FTD/TPI and DC101 is a promising treatment alternative regardless of KRAS mutations.

BACKGROUND: For unresectable or recurrent advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (AGC), tri-weekly administration of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) at 260 mg/m2 achieved a response rate of 27.8% in a phase II trial in Japan. However, frequent neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy limit its use in clinical settings. We, thus, conducted a single-arm phase II trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of a reduced dose (220 mg/m2) of tri-weekly nab-PTX. METHODS: Eligible patients included those with AGC and ECOG performance status of 0-2 who had received one or more prior chemotherapy containing fluoropyrimidine regimens. A reduced dose of nab-PTX (220 mg/m2) was administered tri-weekly. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-control rate (DCR), incidence of adverse events, relative dose intensity (RDI) and proportion of patients receiving subsequent chemotherapy. RESULTS: Among 33 patients enrolled, 32 were treated with protocol therapy. RR was 3.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0-16.2%], which did not reach the protocol-specified threshold (p = 0.966). DCR was 37.5% (95% CI, 21.1-56.3%). Median OS and PFS were 6.3 (95% CI, 4.4-14.2) and 2.2 (95% CI, 1.8-3.1) months, respectively. RDI was 97.8%. Twenty (62.5%) patients received subsequent chemotherapy. Toxicity was relatively mild with the most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events being neutropenia (38%), anemia (13%), fatigue (19%), anorexia (16%), and peripheral neuropathy (13%). CONCLUSION: Tri-weekly nab-PTX with a reduced dose (220 mg/m2) is not recommended for AGC in a second-line or later setting, despite demonstrating less toxicity than at 260 mg/m2. Clinical trial registration The OGSG1302 trial was registered with UMIN-CTR as UMIN000000714.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the HERBIS-4A phase II trial comparing S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) with capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (GC). We performed a pooled analysis of HERBIS-4A and HERBIS-2, the phase II trial comparing SP with XP in HER2-negative recurrent GC patients with a recurrence-free interval after S-1 adjuvant therapy of ≥ 6 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SP [S-1 (40-60 mg twice daily for 21 days) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 8), every 5 weeks] or XP [capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days) plus cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1), every 3 weeks]. RESULTS: In the pooled analysis, SP (n = 44-50) showed a longer progression-free survival [6.4 versus 5.1 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.666; P = 0.062], overall survival (14.8 versus 10.6 months; HR, 0.695; P = 0.099), and time to treatment failure (4.6 versus 3.6 months; HR, 0.668; P = 0.045) as well as a higher disease control rate (86.4% versus 68.1%, P = 0.149) compared with XP (n = 47-51). A significant survival advantage for SP over XP was apparent in patients with a performance status of 0, a differentiated-type tumor histology, or a primary tumor localization to the upper portion of the stomach. CONCLUSION: Our pooled analysis supports the use of SP in the first-line setting for patients with HER2-negative advanced or recurrent GC with a recurrence-free interval of ≥ 6 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The HERBIS-2 trial was registered with UMIN-CTR as UMIN000006105.

BACKGROUND: Older or frail patients are often underrepresented in clinical trials for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We here assessed the efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-leucovorin plus bevacizumab in such patients. METHODS: The study (OGSG 0802) was designed as a single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial. Eligible patients had mCRC and at least one of the following: an age of ≥ 65 years, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or 2, a serum albumin level of ≤ 3.5 g/dL, incompatibility with oxaliplatin or irinotecan, and a history of abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy. Patients received 5-FU (600 mg/m2) and l-leucovorin (200 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 together with bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), and secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled and eligible. Median age was 76 years (range 56-90 years), and 51% of patients had a performance status of 0. The ORR was 36.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.1-53.1%], median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI 7.4-17.7 months), and median OS was 24.0 months (95% CI 19.9 months-not reached). The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were neutropenia (24%), anorexia (10%), leukopenia (7%), and mucositis/stomatitis (7%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Weekly 5-FU-leucovorin with biweekly bevacizumab may be a tolerable and effective treatment option for older or frail patients with mCRC.

AIM: The KEYNOTE-659 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment in Japanese patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. In this paper, we report results from cohort 1 (S-1 plus oxaliplatin [SOX] with pembrolizumab). METHODS: This was a non-randomised, multicentre, open-label phase IIb study in patients with advanced programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative G/GEJ tumours. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), time to response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Exploratory analyses were performed based on the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) status. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were evaluated. The median follow-up was 10.1 months. ORR and DCR by BICR were 72.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 58.4-83.5) and 96.3% (95% CI 87.3-99.5), respectively. Median DOR, TTR, PFS and OS were as follows: not reached, 1.5 months, 9.4 months and not reached. The ORR was 73.9% in patients with CPS ≥1 to <10 and 71.0% in those with CPS ≥10. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported by 57.4% of patients. The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were decreased platelet count (14.8%), decreased neutrophil count (13.0%), colitis (5.6%) and adrenal insufficiency (5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: SOX with pembrolizumab showed encouraging efficacy and a manageable safety profile for the first-line treatment of advanced G/GEJ cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03382600/JapicCTI-183829.

LESSONS LEARNED: Perioperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) therapy showed favorable efficacy with sufficient pathological response. Small sample size limited the statistical power of this result. Perioperative CapeOx therapy showed good feasibility. Further studies with larger sample size are required to validate this novel approach. BACKGROUND: D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 is the standard therapy for patients (pts) with stage III gastric cancer (GC) in Japan; however, the outcome is not satisfactory. We examined the efficacy of perioperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) in pts with GC. METHODS: The eligibility criteria included confirmed clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1-3 M0 GC according to the Japanese Classification (JCGC; 3rd English Edition). Three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx (NAC; capecitabine, 2,000 mg/m2 for 14 days; oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) were administered, followed by five cycles of adjuvant CapeOx (AC) after D2 gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was the pathological response rate (pRR) according to the JCGC (≥grade 1b). RESULTS: Thirty-seven pts were enrolled on CapeOx. An R0 resection rate of 78.4% (n = 29) and a pRR of 54.1% (n = 20, p = .058; 90% confidence interval [CI], 39.4-68.2) were demonstrated. Among 27 pts who initiated AC, 21 (63.6%) completed the treatment. Grade 3-4 toxicities during NAC included neutropenia (8%), thrombocytopenia (8%), and anorexia (8%) and during AC included neutropenia (37%), diarrhea (4%), and anorexia (4%). CONCLUSION: Perioperative CapeOx showed good feasibility and favorable efficacy with sufficient pathological response, although statistical significance at .058 did not reach the commonly accepted cutoff of .05. The data obtained using this novel approach warrant further investigations.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, pre-operative 5-FU and cisplatin(CDDP)(FP)combination therapy has been the standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC)for advanced resectable esophageal cancer(EC); furthermore, the efficacy of the docetaxel (DTX)-containing triplet regimen, FP plus DTX, has been reported. However, patients with impaired renal function should not receive high-dose CDDP. We have been developing a non-CDDP-containing triplet regimen, comprising 5-FU, DTX, and nedaplatin(NED)(UDON), on a phase Ⅰ/Ⅱtrial basis. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of NAC with UDON in advanced EC patients with impaired renal function. METHODS: Five patients with advanced resectable EC with impaired renal function were enrolled in this study. Patients received NAC(5-FU, 640mg/m / 2, days 1-5; DTX, 28 mg/m2, days 1 and 15; and NED, 72mg/m2, day 1, q28, 2 courses); following this, they underwent esophagectomy. The primary endpoint was response rate, and the secondary endpoint was adverse event(AE). RESULTS: The median age was 79 years (range: 58-80 years). The ECOG performance status was 1/2 : 3/2. The main tumor locations were Ce/Ut/Mt : 1/1/3 and the cStages were ⅡA/ⅢA/ⅢC : 1/2/2. The RR(CR/PR/SD/PD : 0/4/1/0)was 80%. The pathological response was grade 1a/1b : 2/3. Major grade 3 or 4 AEs included neutropenia(40%), febrile neutropenia(20%), diarrhea(20%), and hyponatremia( 40%). There was no treatment-related death or reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: NAC with UDON might be feasible and effective in patients with advanced resectable EC with impaired renal function, who are ineligible for high-dose CDDP administration. We are planning a phaseⅡclinical study based on the present results.

Immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) induces durable antitumor efficacy in many types of cancer. However, such clinical benefit is limited because of the insufficient reinvigoration of antitumor immunity with the drug alone; therefore, rational therapeutic combinations are required to improve its efficacy. In our preclinical study, we evaluated the antitumor effect of U3-1402, a human epidermal growth factor receptor 3-targeting (HER3-targeting) antibody-drug conjugate, and its potential synergism with PD-1 inhibition. Using a syngeneic mouse tumor model that is refractory to anti-PD-1 therapy, we found that treatment with U3-1402 exhibited an obvious antitumor effect via direct lysis of tumor cells. Disruption of tumor cells by U3-1402 enhanced the infiltration of innate and adaptive immune cells. Chemotherapy with exatecan derivative (Dxd, the drug payload of U3-1402) revealed that the enhanced antitumor immunity produced by U3-1402 was associated with the induction of alarmins, including high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB-1), via tumor-specific cytotoxicity. Notably, U3-1402 significantly sensitized the tumor to PD-1 blockade, as a combination of U3-1402 and the PD-1 inhibitor significantly enhanced antitumor immunity. Further, clinical analyses indicated that tumor-specific HER3 expression was frequently observed in patients with PD-1 inhibitor-resistant solid tumors. Overall, U3-1402 is a promising candidate as a partner of immunotherapy for such patients.

LESSONS LEARNED: Perioperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) therapy showed favorable efficacy with sufficient pathological response. Small sample size limited the statistical power of this result.Perioperative CapeOx therapy showed good feasibility.Further studies with larger sample size are required to validate this novel approach. BACKGROUND: D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 is the standard therapy for patients (pts) with stage III gastric cancer (GC) in Japan; however, the outcome is not satisfactory. We examined the efficacy of perioperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) in pts with GC. METHODS: The eligibility criteria included confirmed clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1-3 M0 GC according to the Japanese Classification (JCGC; 3rd English Edition). Three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx (NAC; capecitabine, 2,000 mg/m2 for 14 days; oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) were administered, followed by five cycles of adjuvant CapeOx (AC) after D2 gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was the pathological response rate (pRR) according to the JCGC (≥grade 1b). RESULTS: Thirty-seven pts were enrolled on CapeOx. An R0 resection rate of 78.4% (n = 29) and a pRR of 54.1% (n = 20, p = .058; 90% confidence interval [CI], 39.4-68.2) were demonstrated. Among 27 pts who initiated AC, 21 (63.6%) completed the treatment. Grade 3-4 toxicities during NAC included neutropenia (8%), thrombocytopenia (8%), and anorexia (8%) and during AC included neutropenia (37%), diarrhea (4%), and anorexia (4%). CONCLUSION: Perioperative CapeOx showed good feasibility and favorable efficacy with sufficient pathological response, although statistical significance at .058 did not reach the commonly accepted cutoff of .05. The data obtained using this novel approach warrant further investigations.

The anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab is standard therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, most HNSCC tumors are resistant to it and require alternative treatments. Here, we explored the mechanism of cetuximab resistance and evaluated its clinical relevance in HNSCC. An unbiased comprehensive transcriptome analysis was performed on cetuximab-resistant HNSCC FaDuCR cells. The causative resistance genome was knocked down with siRNA, cell signaling was immunologically analyzed, and drug efficacy was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. The mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH) of the causative genome was performed using 28 excised HNSCC tumors and its relationship with cetuximab efficacy was analyzed. FaDuCR cells were resistant to cetuximab, whereas parental FaDu cells were susceptible to it. FaDuCR cells expressed consistently higher levels of phosphorylated Akt than FaDu cells despite cetuximab exposure. A comprehensive transcriptome analysis revealed that the HER3-ligand heregulin was upregulated in FaDuCR cells compared to FaDu cells. Heregulin knockdown in FaDuCR cells repressed HER3 and Akt phosphorylation and recovered cetuximab anticancer efficacy. In contrast, pan-HER family tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as afatinib decreased HER3 and Akt phosphorylation in FaDuCR cells and inhibited FaDuCR tumor growth. Two of the 28 HNSCC tumor samples presented aberrant heregulin expression comparable to that of FaDuCR cells and were resistant to cetuximab therapy. In HNSCC, heregulin-mediated HER3-Akt activation causes resistance to cetuximab but not to second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Subpopulations with aberrant heregulin-expressing HNSCC might be resistant to cetuximab.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) confer a survival benefit in many cancer types. Given that the survival outcome for cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) remains poor, we investigated the potential of CUP for immunotherapy. METHODS: A total of 164 patients with CUP (favorable subset, 34 patients; unfavorable subset, 130 patients) who were treated between January 2009 and March 2017 was identified from a review of medical records at Kindai University Hospital. They included 92 patients for whom pretreatment tumor tissue was available both for determination of programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and for immune-related gene expression profiling (irGEP). The results of irGEP for CUP were compared with published data for ICI-treated solid cancers classified into progressive disease (PD) and non-PD subsets according to their best response to ICIs. RESULTS: The median overall survival of all CUP patients was 29.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.7-not reached) and 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.0-9.4) for favorable and unfavorable subsets, respectively. IHC and irGEP revealed that pretreatment immune activity-including expression of immune checkpoint molecules-for CUP was similar to that for ICI-responsive malignancies (antitumor immune cell signatures: CUP versus PD, P = 0.002-0.067; CUP versus non-PD, P = 0.591-0.999), although VEGFA expression was associated with suppression of antitumor immunity in CUP (P = 0.008, false discovery rate = 0.010). In addition, one case of CUP in the unfavorable subset that was associated with prominent PD-L1 expression on TILs and showed a durable response to nivolumab is presented. CONCLUSIONS: The survival outcome of CUP remains unsatisfactory. However, our clinical and immune profiling of CUP has revealed a potential to benefit from immunotherapy, with ICIs thus being a potential option for CUP treatment.

Medical oncologists are challenged to personalize medicine with scientific evidence, drug approvals, and treatment guidelines based on sequencing of clinical samples using next generation sequencer (NGS). Knowledge-based curation systems have the potential to help address this challenge. We report here the results of examining the level of evidence regarding treatment approval and clinical trials between recommendations made by Watson for Genomics (WfG), QIAGEN Clinical Insight Interpret (QCII), and Oncomine knowledge-based reporter (OKR). The tumor samples obtained from the solid cancer patients between May to June 2018 at Kindai University Hospital. The formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples (n = 31) were sequenced using Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3. Variants including copy number alteration and gene fusions identified by the Ion reporter software were used commonly on three curation systems. Curation process of data were provided for 25 solid cancers using three curation systems independently. Concordance and distribution of curated evidence levels of variants were analyzed. As a result of sequencing analysis, nonsynonymous mutation (n = 58), gene fusion (n = 2) or copy number variants (n = 12) were detected in 25 cases, and subsequently subjected to knowledge-based curation systems (WfG, OKR, and QCII). The number of curated information in any systems was 51/72 variants. Concordance of evidence levels was 65.3% between WfG and OKR, 56.9% between WfG and QCII, and 66.7% between OKR and QCII. WfG provided great number of clinical trials for the variants. The annotation of resistance information was also observed. Larger differences were observed in clinical trial matching which could be due to differences in the filtering process among three curation systems. This study demonstrates knowledge-based curation systems (WfG, OKR, and QCII) could be helpful tool for solid cancer treatment decision making. Difference in non-concordant evidence levels was observed between three curation systems, especially in the information of clinical trials. This point will be improved by standardized filtering procedure and enriched database of clinical trials in Japan.

Aim: Nivolumab has survival benefit in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer; however, about 60% of the patients did not respond to nivolumab, raising the necessity of its predictive biomarkers. Gut microbiome has been shown to be associated with efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody in various types of cancers, but little is known about gastric cancer. Design: This is an observational/translational study to evaluate clinical outcomes of nivolumab and to discover novel immune-related biomarkers (gut microbiome, genetic polymorphism, gene expression and metabolome in plasma) in gastric cancer, using fecal and blood samples at two points before and after treatment. Candidate factors will be explored in first 200 patients and then validated in last 300 patients. Trial registration: UMIN000030850.

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of oesophageal cancer was published in 2016, and covered the management and treatment of local/locoregional disease, limited disease, locally advanced disease and the management of advanced/metastatic disease. At the ESMO Asia Meeting in November 2017 it was decided by both ESMO and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) to convene a special guidelines meeting immediately after the JSMO Annual Meeting in 2018. The aim was to adapt the ESMO 2016 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of metastatic oesophageal cancer in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with metastatic oesophageal cancer representing the oncological societies of Japan (JSMO), China (CSCO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence, and was independent of both the current treatment practices and the drug availability and reimbursement situations in the individual participating Asian countries.

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of gastric cancer (GC) was published in 2016, and covered the management and treatment of local, locoregional, locally advanced and metastatic disease. At the ESMO Asia Meeting in November 2017 it was decided by both ESMO and The Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) to convene a special guidelines meeting immediately after the JSMO Annual Meeting in 2018. The aim was to adapt the ESMO 2016 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of metastatic GC in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with metastatic GC representing the oncological societies of Japan (JSMO), China (CSCO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of both the current treatment practices and the drug availability and reimbursement situations in the individual participating Asian countries.

HER2-targeted therapy, especially the anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab, is standard for HER2-positive breast cancer; however, its efficacy is limited in a subpopulation of patients. HER3 ligand (heregulin)-dependent HER2-HER3 interactions play a critical role in the evasion of apoptosis and are therefore a target for oncotherapy to treat HER2-positive breast cancer. The anti-HER2 antibody pertuzumab and anti-HER3 antibody patritumab both target this heregulin-HER3-HER2 complex in different ways. This study examined the anticancer efficacy of dual HER2 and HER3 blockade in trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer. HER2-positive SKBR3 or BT474 cells overexpressing heregulin (SKBR3-HRG, BT474-HRG) were used to evaluate the efficacy of trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and patritumab in vitro by performing cell viability, immunoblotting, and clonogenic assays. The effects of these agents were then evaluated in vivo using BT474-HRG and an intrinsic heregulin-expressing and HER2-positive JIMT-1 xenograft models. SKBR3-HRG and BT474-HRG cells lost sensitivity to trastuzumab, which was accompanied by Akt activation. Unexpectedly, trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab or patritumab also showed limited efficacy toward these cells. In contrast, trastuzumab/pertuzumab/patritumab triple treatment demonstrated potent anticancer efficacy, concomitant with strong repression of Akt. Finally, in heregulin-expressing BT474-HRG and JIMT-1 xenograft models, the addition of pertuzumab and patritumab to trastuzumab also enhanced antitumor efficacy leading to tumor regression. The current study found that triple blockade of HER2 and HER3 using trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and patritumab could overcome resistance to trastuzumab therapy in heregulin-expressing and HER2-positive breast cancer, which could be exploited clinically.

LESSONS LEARNED: The 5-fluorouracil, docetaxel, and nedaplatin (UDON) regimen was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in terms of both objective response rate and survival for patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the first-line setting.UDON may be an optimal treatment option for patients with advanced esophageal cancer who are unfit for docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil regimens.The high response rate as well as the rapid and marked tumor shrinkage associated with UDON suggest that further evaluation of this regimen in the neoadjuvant setting is warranted. BACKGROUND: A phase II study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), docetaxel, and nedaplatin (UDON) combination therapy for untreated recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer. METHODS: Patients received intravenous nedaplatin (90 mg/m2) on day 1, docetaxel (35 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15, and 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2) on days 1-5 of a 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was response rate, with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), dysphagia score, and adverse events. RESULTS: Between March 2015 and July 2017, 23 patients were enrolled. Of 22 evaluable patients, 16 and 4 individuals experienced a partial response and stable disease, respectively, yielding a response rate of 72.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.8%-89.3%) and disease control rate of 90.9% (95% CI, 70.8%-98.9%). Median OS and PFS were 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.1 months to not reached) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 2.5-10.6 months), respectively. Eleven (64.7%) of the 17 patients with a primary lesion showed amelioration of dysphagia after treatment. Frequent adverse events of grade 3 or 4 included neutropenia (87.0%) and leukopenia (39.1%). Febrile neutropenia was observed in two patients (8.7%). CONCLUSION: This phase II study demonstrated promising antitumor activity and good tolerability of UDON.

A 71-year-old man with a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cerebral infarction was admitted to our hospital with dysphagia. Gastroduodenoscopy, thoracoabdominal CT, and PET-CT findings showed type 2 advanced esophageal cancer( squamous cell carcinoma)with upper mediastinal and cervical lymph node(LN)metastasis: cT3N2M1(LYM #104L), cStage Ⅳ. Two courses of neoadjuvant UDONchemotherapy containing 5-FU(640mg/m / 2, days 1-5), docetaxel(28mg/m2, days 1 and 15), and nedaplatin(72mg/m2, day 1)were administered every 4 weeks. UDONtherapy caused grade(Gr)3 febrile neutropenia, Gr 2 diarrhea, and Gr 1 thrombopenia; the tumor and LNs partially responded to the therapy. After 2 courses of UDONtherapy, esophagectomy with right thoracotomy, 3-field LNdissection, and reconstruction of the gastric tube were performed. The postoperative course was almost uneventful besides recurrent nerve palsy, aspiration, pneumonia, and delirium, and the patient was discharged 60 days after surgery. The pathological diagnosis was ypT0N0M0, ypStage 0, and the histological response of the primary tumor and LNs were evaluated as Gr 3. Neoadjuvant UDON therapy is feasible for elderly patients with advanced esophageal cancer and renal failure or comorbidities, for whom CDDP could not be administered. We are planning a clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of neoadjuvant UDONtherapy.

LESSONS LEARNED: Evidence has suggested that capecitabine-cisplatin is similar or possibly superior to S-1-cisplatin in terms of safety and efficacy for Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).As far as we are aware, our study is the first randomized trial of two regimens consisting of an oral fluoropyrimidine plus cisplatin in human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative AGC patients with measurable lesions. BACKGROUND: We performed a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine plus cisplatin in comparison with S-1 plus cisplatin for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced gastric cancer in Japan. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days plus cisplatin at 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (n = 43) or S-1 at 40-60 mg twice daily for 21 days plus cisplatin at 60 mg/m2 on day 8 every 5 weeks (n = 41). The primary endpoint of the study was response rate. RESULTS: Response rate did not differ significantly between the capecitabine-cisplatin and S-1-cisplatin groups (53.5% vs. 51.2%, respectively, p > .999). S-1-cisplatin tended to confer a better progression-free survival (PFS; median of 5.9 vs. 4.1 months, p = .284), overall survival (OS; median of 13.5 vs. 10.0 months, p = .290), and time to treatment failure (TTF; median of 4.5 vs. 3.1 months, p = .052) compared with capecitabine-cisplatin. Common hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included anemia and neutropenia in both groups. However, anorexia, fatigue, and hyponatremia of grade 3 or 4 occurred more frequently in the capecitabine-cisplatin group. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine-cisplatin failed to demonstrate superior efficacy compared with S-1-cisplatin. The higher incidence of severe adverse events with capecitabine-cisplatin suggests that S-1-cisplatin should remain the standard first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer in Japan.

The efficacy of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) positive for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations has been found to be limited, but the underlying mechanisms for this poor response have remained obscure. Given that the recognition by T cells of tumor antigens presented by major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecules is essential for an antitumor immune response, we examined the effects of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on MHC-I expression in NSCLC cell lines. Appropriate EGFR-TKIs increased MHC-I expression at the mRNA and cell surface protein levels in NSCLC cells positive for EGFR mutations including those with the T790M secondary mutation. Trametinib, an inhibitor of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase MEK, also increased MHC-I expression, whereas the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor buparlisib did not, suggesting that the MEK-ERK pathway mediates the down-regulation of MHC-I expression in response to EGFR activation. Immunohistochemical analysis of EGFR-mutated NSCLC specimens obtained before and after EGFR-TKI treatment also revealed down-regulation of phosphorylated forms of EGFR and ERK in association with up-regulation of MHC-I, an increased number of infiltrating CD8+ T cells, and increased PD-1 ligand 1 expression after such treatment. Our results thus suggest that mutational activation of EGFR inhibits MHC-I expression through the MEK-ERK pathway in NSCLC and thereby contributes to the poor response of such tumors to immunotherapy. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the relation between EGFR-MEK-ERK signaling in and the immune response to EGFR-mutated NSCLC. .

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard therapy for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, these tumours eventually acquire chemoresistance. U3-1402 is an anti-HER3 antibody-drug conjugate with a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, DXd. In the current study, we evaluated the anticancer efficacy of U3-1402 in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. HCC827GR5 and PC9AZDR7 are EGFR-TKI-resistant clones for gefitinib and osimertinib, respectively. U3-1402 alone or in combination with the EGFR-TKI erlotinib demonstrated potent anticancer efficacy in HCC827GR5 cells using an in vitro growth inhibition assay and in vivo xenograft mouse model. U3-1402 induced apoptosis in HCC827GR5 cells accompanying phosphorylation of histone H2A.X, a marker of DNA damage, but did not block HER3/PI3K/AKT signalling. Further, we found using flow cytometry that the cell surface HER3 expression level in HCC827GR5 cells was twice that found in HCC827 cells, indicating internalization of U3-1402 was increased in resistant cells. In addition, administration of U3-1402 notably repressed growth of EGFR-TKI osimertinib-resistant PC9AZDR7 xenograft tumours, and that PC9AZDR7 cells expressed five times greater cell surface HER3 than PC9 cells. Furthermore, using immunofluorescent microscopy, HER3 was observed predominantly in the nucleus of PC9 cells, but was localized in the cytoplasm of PC9AZDR7 cells. This finding indicates that altered trafficking of the HER3-U3-1402 complex may accelerate linker payload cleavage by cytoplasmic lysosomal enzymes, resulting in DNA damage. Our results indicate that administration of U3-1402 alone or in combination with an EGFR-TKI may have potential as a novel therapy for EGFR-TKI-resistant EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

The BRAFV600E mutation occurs in approximately 8% of human colorectal cancers and is associated with therapeutic resistance that is due, in part, to reactivation of MEK/ERK signaling cascade. Recently, pathway analysis identified cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) upregulation in a subset of human BRAFV600E colorectal cancers. Therefore, it was determined whether CDK1 antagonism enhances the efficacy of MEK inhibition in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer cells. BRAFV600E colorectal cancer cell lines expressing CDK1 were sensitized to apoptosis upon siRNA knockdown or small-molecule inhibition with RO-3306 (CDK1 inhibitor) or dinaciclib (CDK1, 2, 5, 9 inhibitors). Combination of RO-3306 or dinaciclib with cobimetinib (MEK inhibitor) cooperatively enhanced apoptosis and reduced clonogenic survival versus monotherapy. Cells isogenic or ectopic for BRAFV600E displayed resistance to CDK1 inhibitors, as did cells with ectopic expression of constitutively active MEK CDK1 inhibitors induced a CASP8-dependent apoptosis shown by caspase-8 restoration in deficient NB7 cells that enhanced dinaciclib-induced CASP3 cleavage. CDK inhibitors suppressed pro-CASP8 phosphorylation at S387, as shown by drug withdrawal, which restored p-S387 and increased mitosis. In a colorectal cancer xenograft model, dinaciclib plus cobimetinib produced significantly greater tumor growth inhibition in association with a caspase-dependent apoptosis versus either drug alone. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) transcriptomic dataset revealed overexpression of CDK1 in human colorectal cancers versus normal colon. Together, these data establish CDK1 as a novel mediator of apoptosis resistance in BRAFV600E colorectal cancers whose combined targeting with a MEK/ERK inhibitor represents an effective therapeutic strategy.Implications: CDK1 is a novel mediator of apoptosis resistance in BRAFV600E colorectal cancers whose dual targeting with a MEK inhibitor may be therapeutically effective. Mol Cancer Res; 16(3); 378-89. ©2017 AACR.

AIM: To evaluate the clinical results of two-step intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients were treated with two-step IMRT between 2002 and 2014. Whole-neck radiotherapy (44.0-50.0 Gy/22-25 fractions) was delivered by IMRT, followed by boost IMRT to the high-risk clinical target volume (total dose of 70.0 Gy/35 fractions). Forty-seven patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Immunohistochemistry for human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV/p16) was performed for 64 patients. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival and locoregional control rates for stage I, II, III, and IVA-B disease were 80.0%, 75.0%, 78.0%, and 64.0% and 100.0%, 75.0%, 92.0%, and 82.0%, respectively. Overall survival was significantly higher in HPV/p16-positive patients than in HPV/p16-negative patients (p=0.01). Xerostomia of grade 2 or more was noted in 10 patients. CONCLUSION: Favourable overall survival and locoregional control rates with excellent salivary preservation were obtained using the two-step IMRT method for oropharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan, oxaliplatin and leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil (FOLFIRINOX) and the combination regimen of gemcitabine and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (GnP) (nab-PTX) improve the prognosis of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, no study has compared the efficacy of the two regimens. We compared retrospectively the efficacy and safety of the two regimens in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer received FOLFIRINOX or GnP as first-line chemotherapy between December 2013 and September 2015. In the FOLFIRINOX group, patients received 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin followed by 180 mg/m2 irinotecan and 200 mg/m2 L-leucovorin, and by 400 mg/m2 fluorouracil as a bolus and 2,400 mg/m2 fluorouracil as a 46-h continuous infusion every 14 days. In the GnP group, patients received 125 mg/m2 nab-PTX followed by 1 g/m2, and gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15, repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Response rate was 6.3% in the FOLFIRINOX group and 40.9% in the GnP group (P=0.025). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.0-4.5] in the FOLFIRINOX group and 6.5 months (95% CI, 6.2-6.9 months) in the GnP group (P=0.031). Drug toxicity in the GnP group was less than in the FOLFIRINOX group. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and safety of GnP compare favorably to those of FOLFIRINOX in patients with pancreatic cancer. Additional prospective trials are warranted.

For primary colorectal cancers (CRCs), tumor stage has been the best predictor of survival after resection and the key determinant of patient management. However, considerable stage-independent variability in clinical outcome is observed that is likely due to molecular heterogeneity. This is particularly important in early stage CRCs where patients can be cured by surgery alone and only a proportion derives benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, the identification of molecular prognostic markers to supplement conventional pathologic staging systems has the potential to guide patient management and influence outcomes. CRC is a heterogeneous disease with molecular phenotypes reflecting distinct forms of genetic instability. The chromosomal instability pathway (CIN) is the most common phenotype, accounting for 85% of all sporadic CRCs. Alternatively, the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype represents ~15% of all CRCs and is caused by deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR) as a consequence of germline mutations in MMR genes or, more commonly, epigenetic silencing of the MLH1 gene with frequent mutations in the BRAF oncogene. MSI tumors have distinct phenotypic features and are consistently associated with a better stage-adjusted prognosis compared with microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors. Among non-metastatic CRCs, the difference in prognosis between MSI and MSS tumors is larger for stage II than stage III patients. On the other hand, the predictive impact of MMR status for adjuvant chemotherapy remains a contentious issue in that most studies demonstrate a lack of benefit for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II MSI-H CRCs, whereas it remains unclear in MSI-H stage III tumors. Here, we describe the molecular aspects of the MMR system and discuss the implications of MMR-deficient/MSI-H status in the clinical management of patients with early stage CRC.

AIM: We performed a pharmacokinetic phase I trial of the combination of S-1 granules and nedaplatin for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with both nedaplatin on day 1 at a dose starting at 80 mg/m(2) (level 1) escalating up to 90 mg/m(2) (level 2), and S-1 granules at a daily dose of 80 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 14 every three weeks. The primary end-point was determination of the recommended dose. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in one out of six patients at dose level 1 (neutropenia) and in all three patients at level 2 (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia). The recommended dose was determined as level 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters of S-1 granule did not differ from the capsula formulation. The response rate was 42.1%. CONCLUSION: This combination was well-tolerated and manifested a promising activity against HNSCC.

OTS11101 is a novel peptide vaccine that acts as an angiogenesis inhibitor by inducing cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) cells that specifically target vascular endothelial cells expressing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 1. We conducted a phase I study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacodynamic biomarker status of this vaccine. Nine patients with advanced solid tumors received 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 mg of OTS11101 subcutaneously, once a week in a 28-day cycle. Three patients experienced grade 1 injection site reactions, which were the most frequent adverse events. Grade 2 proteinuria and hypertension each occurred in one patient. As other toxicities were generally mild, the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Furthermore, we explored the induction of specific activated CTLs, and biomarkers related to angiogenesis. A pharmacodynamics study revealed that induction of specific CTLs was observed for a dose of 2.0 and 3.0 mg. The serum concentrations of soluble VEGF receptor 1 and 2 after vaccination increased significantly compared with baseline. A microarray was performed to give a comprehensive analysis of gene expression, suggesting that OTS11101 vaccination resulted in T cell activation in a clinical setting. In conclusion, OTS11101 was well tolerated in patients up to 3.0 mg once weekly and our biomarker analysis suggested that this anti-angiogenesis vaccine is biologically active.

BACKGROUND: The EML4-ALK fusion oncogene represents a recently identified molecular target in a subset of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Limited data have been available, however, on the outcome of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with EML4-ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who have not been treated with an ALK kinase inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy was compared between patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC who harbor EML4-ALK and those who harbor EGFR mutations and those with neither molecular abnormality. RESULTS: Among 200 patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, 18 (9.0%) were positive for EML4-ALK, 31 (15.5%) harbored EGFR mutations, and 151 (75.5%) were wild type for both abnormalities. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy showed similar efficacies in the EML4-ALK, EGFR mutation, and wild-type cohorts in terms of response rate and progression-free survival, and overall survival in the EML4-ALK cohort closely resembled that in the wild-type cohort. Within the EML4-ALK cohort, patients with variants 1 or 3 of the fusion gene were predominant and did not appear to differ in their sensitivity to the platinum-based regimens. CONCLUSION: Patients with EML4-ALK-positive advanced NSCLC manifest an aggressive clinical course similar to that of those with wild-type tumors if the effective targeted therapy is not instituted.